QUOTE(Mr. Muto @ Sep 15 2007, 05:00 PM)
Totally agree!
Glad someone else saw the Clear Baiting of the original post.
Later,
Muto
No, this wasn't baiting. You accuse me of not having honest motives; that hurts.
This was truly an effort to stop the Santorum hate rhetoric before it got started. If you read the thread from the last article about the fund raiser, I couldn't believe the amount of hate that was there almost from the very first post. People actually posted wishes that his rights be taken from him because they didn't like what he said. Instead, tell me what he said or tell me what he did. I will reserach it to see the full context and see if it is true. Then I will weigh all the fact and decide if this man deserves my suport, not if this man deserves yours.
I really like to banter with words. I love a good line of rhetoric. But that is not possible when people start attacking with hate and ad hominem fallacies that have nothing to do with the issues.
Mr. Santorum is controversial; very controversial. He is also stubborn and steadfast. But much of what he is purported to have said upon closer research is untrue or twisted out of it's original meaning. The earlier post by Daisy is a great example. But the left has distorted and misreported them because he dares to touch politically incorrect issues and speak out against them.
