QUOTE(greidel @ Jan 23 2008, 07:39 AM)
It's good to see that the party came to right decision. It is a shame that it was a fall-back position that they only arrived at after failing to agree among themselves in whose favor to rig it.
No, no you got it all wrong!
It was a fall back position only after failing to demonstrate fortitude to go the distance after the reality message from those accused of being "out of touch" by committee memberss, turned out to be on point.
Who is out of touch now!
"Naturally, I'm disappointed we weren't able to come up with an endorsement," Sahd said, "but you can't expect our good committee people to stay all hours of the night to get there."But on the bright side it has demonstrated that the "PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN" not the party yahoos who ask for apologies when they are "out of touch"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE(Kate @ Jan 23 2008, 09:35 AM)
Let's see - you (Bill Neff) only received two votes from the committee people.
Let's see how you fare with the voters...................
Sorry kate I am not running so I am not sure why you would say....
"Let's see how
you fare with the voters"
You seem a bit miffed.
Hey 2 votes may not be much for this guy, but it is 2 more then what he had after you attacked him for being honest and demanded an apology from him for trying to point out the truth to
your committee.
2 becomes 4 and so on and so forth. You don't seem so aggressive now that his concerns have been proven to be the voice of more then he.
Sour Grapes?
