QUOTE(GOP Truth @ Mar 12 2008, 03:40 PM)
Open letter to Candidate McDonald and his apologist McHarper. Given this recent pledge, please explain the following issues for me:
I barely know Steve McDonald, we've spoken maybe two or three times.
I'm a Democrat, so I can't vote for or against him in the primary.
As an uninvolved observer, I'll attempt to untwist at least some of your spin:
QUOTE(GOP Truth @ Mar 12 2008, 03:40 PM)
2) Explain the consistency of "term limiting" yourself to 3 terms in the Senate.
That one is easy. It takes the better part of two terms to gain enough seniority to be effective as a State Senator. A two-term promise is in many ways self-defeating, and constituents will pay the price.
QUOTE(GOP Truth @ Mar 12 2008, 03:40 PM)
3) Please explain why you are willing to not take a pension, but I believe you are willing to take health insurance?
That is a foolish question, if ever there were one. Have you priced health insurance on the open market? An individual would have to be independently wealthy, or incredibly foolish, to NOT ask for health insurance as a part of their compensation.
Would you take a full-time job without accepting health insurance from your new employer?
QUOTE(GOP Truth @ Mar 12 2008, 03:40 PM)
In closing, McDonald's pledge is hypocritical to his past behavior at best, and disingenous at worst.
I'm sorry, but your last question PROVES that it is YOU who is hypocritical.
And your second question proves that you are disingenuous.
QUOTE(GOP Truth @ Mar 12 2008, 03:40 PM)
1) Explain the consistency of your support for Roy Baldwin
QUOTE(GOP Truth @ Mar 12 2008, 03:40 PM)
Consistency counts, and I'd like to know how support of a notorious pay-jacker is consistent with his reform message.
I don't know Roy Baldwin, or much about him. But this much is obvious:
Your posts CONSISTENTLY attack Steve McDonald. Your consistency proves that you have an agenda. What you HAVEN'T told us is who you support that you feel the need to so consistently and so viciously attack Steve McDonald.
My guess is that you support Paul Thibault. His record as County Commissioner proves that he is exactly the type of tax-and-spend RINO that Lancaster does NOT need.
If it is Smucker you are supporting, then it is long past time you explain yourself.
As you said, consistency counts. And you have been quite consistent in your attacks.