Current Conditions
56°F - P/SUNNY
Obama: Hot ticket
Thousands line up for chance to see candidate.
Sunday News
Mar 30, 2008 00:20 EST
Lancaster
By PAUL FRANZ, Staff

The complete text of this article is no longer available online.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 11 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ Mar 31 2008, 09:30 PM)
Okay, I'm making it public.............for the first time ever......(who I'm voting for, that is)
Hillary Clinton has more balls than Barack Obama will ever have so all I have to say is..............MAY THE BEST MAN WIN.......
You figure it out!!!!!


So you're saying Hillary is the best man for the job?

SurLaLune
QUOTE(SurLaLune @ Mar 31 2008, 09:38 PM)

So you're saying Hillary is the best man for the job?


I'm saying................lesser of the two evils (LMAO)

Bigmaclender2
Why restrict yourself to the annointed candidates? Lesser of evils results in voting for evil.

Sorry, but I see no humor in that. There is someone running that is outside that "evil" equation. Dr. Ron Paul. Don't fall into the cult of personality. This is an election. Much different type of contest that a sports game or pageant, where picking a winner should depend on who you think is best qualified, not who you think is going to win, based on media hype.

"I voted for the guy who won, that makes me a winner!" <mental defective.
Change. That's a pregnant term. Full of hope.

Exactly what have these characters done in their careers that hints that they are even capable of stepping out of the mold? They embody the mold. I think they are full of something besides hope. I don't expect change from those who embody the current approach. Counter-intuitive.

Use your vote in a popularity contest, or cast your vote based on established record.

Whirlwind
QUOTE(Whirlwind @ Apr 1 2008, 06:27 AM)
Why restrict yourself to the annointed candidates? Lesser of evils results in voting for evil.

Sorry, but I see no humor in that. There is someone running that is outside that "evil" equation. Dr. Ron Paul. Don't fall into the cult of personality. This is an election. Much different type of contest that a sports game or pageant, where picking a winner should depend on who you think is best qualified, not who you think is going to win, based on media hype.

"I voted for the guy who won, that makes me a winner!" <mental defective.
Change. That's a pregnant term. Full of hope.

Exactly what have these characters done in their careers that hints that they are even capable of stepping out of the mold? They embody the mold. I think they are full of something besides hope. I don't expect change from those who embody the current approach. Counter-intuitive.

Use your vote in a popularity contest, or cast your vote based on established record.


I do apologize, whirlwind. I should tell you that I missed the cutoff for switching my card from Republican to Democrat or independant........I can't vote at all.......well, not for who i want in the primary anyways...........I haven't even checked out Ron Paul..........tell me what you know.........

Bigmaclender2
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ Apr 1 2008, 07:45 AM)

I do apologize, whirlwind. I should tell you that I missed the cutoff for switching my card from Republican to Democrat or independant........I can't vote at all.......well, not for who i want in the primary anyways...........I haven't even checked out Ron Paul..........tell me what you know.........



I know he doesn`t have a chance.And a vote for him is like a vote for Nader.It will only strenghten the chance for the Repubs to hold the Whitehouse.He has good ideas,seems like a good person but,he just doesn`t have the pull.
Hammer
Top Ads