QUOTE(Artie See @ Apr 10 2006, 04:58 PM)
My concern is that ONE "strong executive" could gather near dictatorial powers, much like Charlie Smithgall did in his second term. The ONLY way I could consider supporting this plan is if every single individual on this board, especially the "strong executive", is limited to one term of no more than two years. Period. Otherwise, these people become too detached from their constituents, and too interested in their own re-election, to properly serve the people.
I agree that centralized power held too long will gather a dictatorial attitude. Term limits are a great idea that unfortunately is not held in Congress and the Senate (state government too!).
The military spends a sizable amount of money moving people (rotating duty stations) because they understand that same theory. Another form of checks and balances!