Current Conditions
20°F - CLEAR
Mom blames NYC for girl's death
Lancaster woman seeks $50M after child, 6, dies in foster care.
Lancaster New Era
Published: May 27, 2008
11:15 EST
Lancaster
By TOM MURSE, Staff
Michelle Gochenaur was fighting to bring her 6-year-old daughter home to Lancaster.
Webster
 
1 of 1

The 28-year-old says she cleaned up her life since losing Taylor Webster to a foster family while serving a two-month prison term in 2002.

She got an apartment on East Grant Street, a block from the Lancaster County Prison, and is busy raising two children on her own.

"People change," she said.

But just days before her open-adoption case was to be heard in New York last week, Gochenaur got the phone call she never expected.

Her little girl was dead.

Webster, living in East Harlem, N.Y., died after her foster mother allegedly placed a patch containing the powerful painkiller fentanyl on the girl's neck when she complained of a headache.

The girl died on May 18.

And Gochenaur, her biological mom, has now filed a $50 million notice of claim against the City of New York and its Administration for Children's Services, claiming "negligent supervision of the foster home" and "failure to provide the infant with a safe environment."
Related Topics


In an interview with Gochenaur at her apartment this morning, she said she had been worried about her daughter's welfare for years.

"I was very concerned. That's why I was trying to get her out," she said. "But it has been very difficult to get any information about my daughter — until my daughter died."

Last week, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg defended the city's Administration for Children's Services. "There was no reason to go to court and try to remove the child," he was quoted as saying by the New York Daily News.

"There's not any evidence that she deliberately tried to hurt the child, so it's a little bit different than other situations," he said.

The agency, however, had already investigated the Harlem foster mom, 54-year-old Joanne Alvarez, for excessively spanking Webster and for raising her two foster children in filth, the newspaper reported.

Alvarez was charged Friday with criminally negligent homicide and was indicted on a charge of endangering the welfare of a child.

Webster, born in Harlem in March of 2002, lived with Craig Webster, who had signed the birth certificate as her father, until he died. She was 6 months old at the time, and her mother was in jail on charges in New York that she declined to specify today.

"I was very stupid in my past," Gochenaur said. "It was stupidity, what I had done."

Gochenaur's attorney, Howard R. Sanders of New York City, said, "She had some difficulty taking care of her daughter when she was younger. The father who's on the certificate passed away."

At 18 months, the girl was placed with a foster family, where she has lived since then while her biological mother has tried to be part of her life again.

The last time Gochenaur saw her daughter was in 2005, in court.

"I spent time with her. She liked making jokes, doing pictures," Gochenaur said. "She kept crying all the time as I was leaving. That's the one thing that bothers me all the time."

Gochenaur said she was trying to get Alvarez to agree to an open adoption, which would allow the biological mother more chances to spend time with her daughter. But Alvarez resisted, she said.

A court hearing was scheduled for this past Thursday.

By then, Webster was dead.

"It doesn't make any sense," Gochenaur said.

She is making plans for her daughter to be buried here.

"I finally get to bring my daughter home," she said sadly.


Staff writer Tom Murse can be reached at tmurse@LNPnews.com or 481-6021.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 35 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE(s965sapphire @ May 30 2008, 02:48 AM)
I feel very bad for this innocent loss of life, but the biological mother is seeking a payout for a child that she barely knew. Furthermore the child hasn't even been given a decent burial before the biological mother announces to the public that she wants paid. Sure people make mistakes, but let's not forget that if this woman had thought about her children from the door, the child would have never been placed in harms way. There are some issues that weren't addressed. Is this child the only one of the biological mother that is currently in foster care? I doubt it! Why was the child taken away in the first place?

Gochenaur said she was trying to get Alvarez to agree to an open adoption, which would allow the biological mother more chances to spend time with her daughter. But also stated in the article that she said she had been worried about her daughter's welfare for years. So why would you agree to an open adoption or any adoption with this particular foster parent, if she had so many concerns for her safety.
If a civil suit is planned or money is granted..donate the proceeds to an organization designed to help other children in this unfortunate situation instead of rewarding an absent mother for having as she put it "a stupid past."



Great post for your first, thank you!

dee
I suspect that a little further investigation of the bio mom will reveal that she is not quite the victim she paints herself to be in this article.

Has she always had custody of the children who live with her now? If so, why did she not try to regain custody of the child in NY instead of agreeing to an adoption? What does NY know about her that PA does not? Does she have other children in foster care?

The only victims here are the children. It is unimaginable that she could profit from her child's death.

Livia
What exactly is the meaning of "open adoption" as it pertains to this story??? Because that term REALLY confuses me. We adopted our son 20 years ago through an "open adoption". At that time it simply meant we knew the biological mother and she knew us. We spent time together before the adoption papers were signed and had the POSSIBILITY of her seeing our son after the adoption was completed, if we agreed to it. It in NO WAY guaranteed her any "rights" to see the baby, have contact with the baby or even spend time alone with the baby if we, the adopted parents, did not consent to it. the open adoption also provided a means, if he so desired, for him to find out information about her without a bunch of red tape to go through. The adoption was still legal and binding and after it was complete there was no chance for the bio mom to ever take custody of that child again, so I'm confused why the mention of an open adoption and the bio mom seeking to regain custody. She can't have it both ways. Our lawyers (we had 2 for us and 2 for our son) all explained an open adoption as being the same as any other adoption just without all the secrecy, definately not as a way of the birth mom somehow regaining custody at a later time. So, what was this bio mom really doing....giving the child up for adoption or seeking to regain custody....again...she can't have it both ways!!!!
babblu429
QUOTE(s965sapphire @ May 30 2008, 02:48 AM)
I feel very bad for this innocent loss of life, but the biological mother is seeking a payout for a child that she barely knew. Furthermore the child hasn't even been given a decent burial before the biological mother announces to the public that she wants paid. Sure people make mistakes, but let's not forget that if this woman had thought about her children from the door, the child would have never been placed in harms way. There are some issues that weren't addressed. Is this child the only one of the biological mother that is currently in foster care? I doubt it! Why was the child taken away in the first place?

Gochenaur said she was trying to get Alvarez to agree to an open adoption, which would allow the biological mother more chances to spend time with her daughter. But also stated in the article that she said she had been worried about her daughter's welfare for years. So why would you agree to an open adoption or any adoption with this particular foster parent, if she had so many concerns for her safety.
If a civil suit is planned or money is granted..donate the proceeds to an organization designed to help other children in this unfortunate situation instead of rewarding an absent mother for having as she put it "a stupid past."

booodie
Well people look for their payday and its sad to see it come at the cost of a little girls life..Every child this girl have goes into the system ... She has for now 1 at home until this little girl end up in the same place....The grandfather is raising the other little one for now... And he's not fit to raise a pet mouse..We should be lucky that the mother cannot have more children.. We are paying for all her kids it had to stop...And now she will sue for a little girl she did not know.. This world is screwed up...

booodie
Top Ads