Current Conditions
21°F - P/CLOUDY
Trouble follows head of F&M home
It was the week the college and an alternative newspaper collided.
Sunday News
Published: Jun 08, 2008
00:20 EST
Lancaster
By GIL SMART, Editor
The missing box showed up Friday, delivered to the Clymer & Musser law offices downtown.
A Lancaster Post newspaper box sits at corner near the Fry home.
 
1 of 1

Franklin & Marshall College security forces, it seems, had the red newspaper box since Monday, but held onto it for four days. Perhaps they weren't sure who owned it.

Even though it had the Lancaster Post's newspaper logo on top.

The box was originally on Marietta Avenue at South School Lane — across the street from Nevonia, the mansion owned by F&M and the home of President John Fry and his family. The box disappeared sometime last Sunday, so on Tuesday, Post co-publishers Ron Harper Jr. and Christiaan Hart Nibbrig came and installed a new box — this one on the north side of the road, right outside the border of F&M's property.

Moments later, F&M security roared up — and, Harper says, beat him up.

The incident generated considerable outrage, with Harper accusing Fry of using his "jack-booted thugs" to both stifle freedom of the press and try to intimidate him personally.

But it appeared last week that there was plenty of intimidation to go around.

In the driveway of his stately home Thursday, Fry seemed upset. At least once, he said, Harper came to the house after he was warned to stay off F&M property.

Harper says that's a lie — though "real" journalists, he said, do what they must to get a quote.

Fry has three children, age 7, 13 and 17, and he said they're scared. Who is this guy that keeps coming around, even after being told to stay away?

"You know, set up the video camera outside my office," said Fry. "Videotape me all day. Record me walking to my car. I'm a big boy. I can take it.

"But leave my family out of it."

Harper was having none of it Friday.

"He's trying to deflect attention from his Gestapo tactics by hiding behind his kids' diapers," he said.

Article on students

In its May 30 edition, the Lancaster Post ran an article about two F&M students who had been arrested and charged with stealing liquor from the then-unfinished Iron Hill Brewery in College Row. Post sources said Fry asked Lancaster County District Attorney Craig Stedman to "go easy" on the students; both may be given the opportunity to plead guilty and enter the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program.

Said F&M spokeswoman Dulcey Antonucci Friday: "We deny it totally."

In the course of reporting the story, Harper wanted a comment from Fry. So he went to Fry's house and knocked on the door. When no one answered, Harper left a business card on the windshield of Fry's car.

Fry said Thursday that he told Antonucci he didn't want Harper at his house. Antonucci called Harper and, she said, told him he wasn't to come to the house.

Harper's account of that conversation differed: He said Antonucci said nothing about staying off the property — but merely tried to palm him off on a college vice president. "She said, 'Here's the procedure you have to follow' " to get a comment, he said.

Harper said he told Antonucci, "I'm not going to tell you how to do your job, and I'm certainly not going to let you tell me how to do mine."

Harper would return to Fry's house, knocking on the door again. No answer; so he left another card.

Harper was then hand-delivered a "defiant trespass notice," warning him that if he set foot on any F&M property, he would be arrested. The day the Post printed its story about the F&M students, someone left four copies of the newspaper on Fry's front porch.

Fry said only his 7-year-old and a baby sitter, an F&M student, were home at the time.

Antonucci said the college "is not accusing" Harper of dropping off the papers — but, she said, the incident further concerned Fry and other college officials.

Russ Eshleman, a former Philadelphia Inquirer reporter who teaches journalism at Penn State and writes a column for the Sunday News, said that "all of us who worked as reporters have at one time or another staked out public officials." While covering Harrisburg, he said, he used to try and ascertain when the governor was walking to his car so he could "ambush" him with a few questions.

Still, said Fry, "My kids don't understand this. They're asking me, 'Who is he? Should we switch on the security system?' "

Harper dismissed this: "I have five kids of my own. I love kids.

"This is nothing but an attempt to dismiss the fact that I was assaulted by his private police."

Video camera

That altercation happened Tuesday, June 3, just as Harper and Hart Nibbrig had finished installing the new newspaper box in the public right-of-way near Fry's property. Several F&M security officers, alerted by an F&M employee at the mansion, roared up; Harper, then on the opposite side of Marietta Avenue, switched on his video camera and recorded part of the confrontation.

"Were you on that property?" one guard asks. Harper responds: "No — on the public sidewalk."

The officer is repeatedly heard telling Harper to shut off his video camera; Harper refuses. The video ends with Harper apparently being forced to the ground. "Do not touch me!" Harper yells just before the camera shuts off.

At a news conference to discuss the event Wednesday, Harper sported a large purple bruise on his right temple. F&M security, he said, body-slammed him to the ground, took his video camera, and confiscated Hart Nibbrig's camera, deleting pictures of the incident.

Fry said he was in Philadelphia that day, returning to his home just as the incident was taking place. He saw the flashing lights, and his first thought was that there might have been a traffic accident. So he approached — and saw Harper.

Fry said he walked away, opting to let security handle the situation.

Harper was handcuffed, arrested and put in an F&M holding cell for two hours. He was charged with summary defiant trespass and summary disorderly conduct.

"And the whole time I was sitting in that cell, my newspaper box was in the next room," Harper said.

Harper said he believes F&M security stole the box, though he can't prove it.

Asked if he thinks Fry ordered F&M security to rough him up, Harper responded: "Fry gave his people the notice that they were to 'get' me."

Hart Nibbrig was not charged.

Harper, 44, of Stevens, has long specialized in catching police behavior on video. In 2005, he was involved in an altercation with city police, who charged him with harassment, but soon withdrew the charge. On the tape of that incident, police are shown shoving Harper and threatening him with arrest.

Harper was also involved in a 2004 incident with Manheim Township police, after being removed from a township meeting when he charged that officials had violated the Sunshine Act. Harper also taped part of that incident; police threatened to charge Harper with violating wiretap laws. Police detained Harper, but never charged him; Harper later sought, and got, an apology.

Often, he knows better than police exactly what the law allows him to do; sometimes, that seems to anger the cops.

"My public safety people are protective of the house," acknowledged Fry. "And they were bothered because [Harper] had been on the property after being told not to — and all of a sudden, he's here."

Harper, however, said that at no time after receiving the defiant trespass warning did he set foot on F&M property.

He also thinks the warning itself was bogus: "That defiant trespass warning is not fair use," said Harper. "It's not to keep people away from asking difficult questions.

"Fry has never called me back, and I don't have to accept a media flack."

But Eshleman, the Penn State journalism professor, said that "no comment" often speaks as loud as a perfunctory quote.

Asked if F&M planned to pursue the charges against Harper, Fry said he will "let the lawyers handle that."

Len Brown, of Clymer & Musser, who is representing the Lancaster Post, said in an e-mail:

"The Lancaster Post wants to be able to freely distribute its paper in the public areas of the county just like every other paper does. If their right to do so is not impeded then legal action will not be necessary."

An investigation into the incident with F&M security is ongoing, Brown said. "Reporters should not have to live in fear of being harassed, roughed up and put in holding cells by the police," wrote Brown. "We have sent a litigation hold letter to attorneys for Franklin & Marshall demanding that they preserve all video, audio and other evidence of the encounter."

During the Wednesday press conference, Harper said he intended to seek a restraining order against F&M; but as of Friday afternoon, "Nothing has been filed and it's our hope nothing will need to be filed," said Brown.

Said Harper: "I was assaulted for putting up a constitutionally protected newspaper box. That's what this is about."

Fry said he realizes the box is constitutionally protected. Yes, he said, it is in the public right-of-way.

But it's also there, he believes, to taunt him.

"Why doesn't he just do this at the college?"



Gil Smart is associate editor of the Sunday News. E-mail him at gsmart@lnpnews.com, or phone 291-8817.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 243 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE(Bigby_M @ Jun 11 2008, 02:08 PM)


Artie the facts are that Harper printed a story that was untrue. What kind of tabloid journalist prints a story impugning ther integrity of a community leader without even bothering to check if it was true?

You are the one who loks like a fool always whining about elected officials and integrity.

Your hatred of Fry has blinded you. The story is not about the reaction of F&M security it is about the truth which you have totally ignored.

You have no integrity Artie. That paper has no integrity.

Your rants are just hot gas.

I tried to warn you and you blame the messenger.

You are exactly like the people you rant and rave against.

Yeah you know the facts, as told by Harper.

Note from Ron Harper, Jr.,

Post News Editor:

Lancaster County District Attorney, Craig Stedman,

contacted me as we were going to press. Mr. Stedman

said that neither he nor anyone from his office has

communicated with the school or anyone associated with

the school over the charges involving the F&M students.
Bigs reply:

Harper should apologize...to Mr. Fry and to his readers. Apparently the DA called Harper and told him there was no truth to Harpers assertions that the F&M students got preferential treatment.
My reply: Not one word in that paragragh mentions anything about Harper or Steadman speaking of giving preferential treatment to those students.

It simply states that no one from his office had any communication with F&M regarding the charges.
He patiently answered my multiple questions regarding contact

with the school, and said that not only wasn’t there any

contact directly, there was no third party contact, either. Mr.

Stedman’s comments should be weighed and considered by

our readers.
Bigs reply: None
My reply:

I see this paragragh as a compliment to Steadman's patience and willingness to cooperate with the press.

He is also stating that he is unaware of anyone outside his office discussing the issue with F&M's officials.

Then Harper is simply stating that Steadman's comments may or may not be true, and that we should get all the facts and formulate our own opinions.
I must add that Mr. Stedman has been generous with his

time and patience with my questions and responded quickly

with an understanding of newspaper deadlines. (He even

responded last week during a break from his Memorial Day
celebration, which was also appreciated.)
Bigs reply: None
My reply:

Mr Harper is again complimenting Steadman's generosity with his time and patience with his questions. Also, the next line indicates to me that Harper made the initial phone call to the DA's office and evidently Mr steadman was not available to take the call. The part about his quick response indicates to me that Harper left a voice mail for a return call and left a press deadline in the message.
Bigs reply:

The DA contacted Harper?????

So Harper never called anyone at the DAs office to verify that the kids got special treatment and instead went with a story libeling Mr Fry without any eveidence whatsoever?

Shame on Harper and his supporters.

It gets worse. Harper apparently was told by DA Steadman that no special treatment was given to these kids over memorial day, yet despite knowing the truth he continued to stalk and harrass Mr. Fry based on a story he knew was untrue.

Apparently the truth is a victim of Harpers newspaper.

I would suggest a public apology by Harper followed by Artie See explaining why he doesn't resign given the truth we now know.

Shame on Harper for all his trouble making based on lies.
My reply to Bigs reply:

District Attorneys are not in the habit of calling the people of the press just because they like 'em. Ron Harper made the call to them first.
So where are the lies Bigs ?
And as any good newspaper editor knows to do, is have both the posititve and the negative story ready to go at press time.
Now please Bigs, stop harpin' on ths post. You didn't read it right, which brings me to what I said before.

Lack of education, Bigby M is unable to comprehend or retain what he reads.
frankomav47
I will answer some questions again that I answered before but I guess some people can't understand what I wrote. First off, Harper reported that two kids were caught stealing some beer from a bar. They are F&M students. They have no prior record and were charged with burglary. Harper gets all excited because he did read anything about it in the LNP. HARPER says there is a coverup. That the kids are getting special treatment because they are getting ARD. Well folks with no prior record they qualify for the ARD program. I can't even guess how many time I submitted a news release and never saw anything in the paper about it. LNP publishes what it wants to and if there isn't enough room in the paper for an article it gets left out, need that advettising money first and foremost. Sorry, but I don't se what the big deal is. Now he bugs the pres. of F&M several times and is given notice not to come on F&M property. Now it gets reported to F&M security that Harper trespasssed at the pres. house which is F&M property. Security responds to the scene and see Harper across the street fromk the pres. residence. They proceeded over to Harper to give him a citation for trespass and from that point on we don't know what happened. Harper has his side and the college has there side. None of us were there so we can only go by what both parties are saying. One critical point is that Harper and his business partner put a paper dispenser in front of the pres. residence. Now Harper is free to do that but you must ask the question, why put it at that location. Will the dispenser be empty in a matter of minutes or are the papers going to be there for a very long time. I can think of ten thousand better locations for that dispenser than the one Harper chose. Could it be that Harper was baiting the pres.? We all know Harper, what do you think. I want to see Harper's paper become a success but I want him to tackle issues that are important to the people of Lancaster Co. not some half !profanity!ed article about two spoiled Manheim Twp. brats.
groundpounder
WOW, FRANK!!!! Point/counterpoint???? (post #240) I love it ...
AngelFace
QUOTE(AngelFace @ Jun 11 2008, 08:51 PM)

WOW, FRANK!!!! Point/counterpoint????


Angelface you ignorant $lut.
citydweller
QUOTE(groundpounder @ Jun 11 2008, 08:42 PM)
I will answer some questions again that I answered before but I guess some people can't understand what I wrote. First off, Harper reported that two kids were caught stealing some beer from a bar. They are F&M students. They have no prior record and were charged with burglary. Harper gets all excited because he did read anything about it in the LNP. HARPER says there is a coverup. That the kids are getting special treatment because they are getting ARD. Well folks with no prior record they qualify for the ARD program. I can't even guess how many time I submitted a news release and never saw anything in the paper about it. LNP publishes what it wants to and if there isn't enough room in the paper for an article it gets left out, need that advettising money first and foremost. Sorry, but I don't se what the big deal is. Now he bugs the pres. of F&M several times and is given notice not to come on F&M property. Now it gets reported to F&M security that Harper trespasssed at the pres. house which is F&M property. Security responds to the scene and see Harper across the street fromk the pres. residence. They proceeded over to Harper to give him a citation for trespass and from that point on we don't know what happened. Harper has his side and the college has there side. None of us were there so we can only go by what both parties are saying. One critical point is that Harper and his business partner put a paper dispenser in front of the pres. residence. Now Harper is free to do that but you must ask the question, why put it at that location. Will the dispenser be empty in a matter of minutes or are the papers going to be there for a very long time. I can think of ten thousand better locations for that dispenser than the one Harper chose. Could it be that Harper was baiting the pres.? We all know Harper, what do you think. I want to see Harper's paper become a success but I want him to tackle issues that are important to the people of Lancaster Co. not some half !profanity!ed article about two spoiled Manheim Twp. brats.

Very nice post.

LancCity
Top Ads