QUOTE(Save-the-Land @ Jun 12 2008, 11:36 AM)
mam - you are correct and I'm sorry if my original comments seemed rude. It is understood the Academy does great work. I applaud what the Academy does to promote music in Lancaster and the great work these two fine people do. I didn't intend to diminish their work and what they mean to Lancaster.
On the other hand, I view architecture as a very democratic and civic art and even though this building sits on private property they had a responsibility to design and construct a building that fit into the context of the City and the neighborhood - they missed the mark! I can't excuse the horrid and elitist design of that building no matter what good goes on inside of the building. Phillip Johnson (RIP) was well know as an architect that produced monuments onto himself without respecting the site and the social and cultural context of the city and neighborhood. By hiring a "starchitect" the Academy missed a wonderful opportunity to add to the richness of Lancaster's wonderful architecture. I'm not saying it had to look like an 1800's or early 1900's building....but how 'bout a bit of a nod to the forms and materials of Lancaster's rich architectural heritage? I think it's a bit arrogant they ignored these elements.
I'm no expert in architechture, so have at it. I just wanted to say thank you to the Jamanis' for continuing to grace Lancaster with their musical talents. I took piano lessons from Mr. Jamanis for a few years. I wasn't a worthy student - he is an amazing musician! But, I would certainly direct anyone serious about musical study to this Academy and the Jamanis'.