Current Conditions
52°F - CLEAR
Township to decide on regional agreement
East Hempfield only member of 11-muncipality planning group that has yet to adopt growth plan.
Lancaster New Era
Published: Jul 02, 2008
10:15 EST
Lancaster
By DAVID O’CONNOR, Staff
In the old movie "12 Angry Men," a lone juror is the holdout for a not-guilty verdict after the other 11 jurors agree to convict.

East Hempfield Township now finds itself in the same boat, as the lone municipality here that has yet to approve a city-suburban agreement on how the greater Lancaster region should grow.

But now is decision time for the five township supervisors, who meet this evening and are expected to either approve or reject joining 10 other communities here in an agreement to implement a regional comprehensive plan.

While it's not clear how the vote will go, three have expressed reservations.

Supporters on the East Hempfield Board of Supervisors, including Chairman John Bingham, believes the measure is long overdue and gives their township better control over future land plans.

Opponents, such as Supervisor Heidi Wheaton, believe "there are still some serious issues" with the proposal regarding local control and how much growth it would encourage.

The supervisors meet at 7:30 p.m. at the township building in Landisville, and expect to vote on the plan in the latter half of the meeting.

East Hempfield is one of 11 municipalities in the Lancaster Inter-Municipal Committee coverage area that has approved a regional comprehensive plan called "Growing Together."

But the suburban township also is the only one that has yet to approve an agreement to toward implementing the regional plan.
Related Topics


Along with East Hempfield, LIMC members are Lancaster City, the townships of East Lampeter, Lancaster, Manheim, Manor, West Hempfield and West Lampeter, and East Petersburg, Millersville and Mountville boroughs.

Wheaton, in talking to supervisors and others from other communities, said "a number of people have expressed reservations about this ... reservations about the loss of control" over growth and land plans for each community.

But Bingham disagrees.

"A 'no' vote by any of the 11 (municipalities), and the process stops, and that's not good for Lancaster County, in my opinion."

A few people have expressed concerns about the LIMC measure at past meetings, but the measure has been approved easily by the other governing boards.

Bingham feels it's the right plan for the township, while fellow Supervisor Bernard Krutsick also supports it: "They (those with concerns) feel that we would lose control of our own township, and that's not correct ... if anything, this gives us more control.

"I'm also a little disappointed that we haven't voted on this yet," since the supervisors have been dealing with it since early this year, Krutsick added.

Along with Wheaton, the two remaining supervisors, Brett Miller and Doug Brubaker, also have had some of the same concerns as Wheaton about the proposal.

Both men couldn't immediately be reached for comment this morning.


Staff writer David O'Connor can be reached at doconnor@LNPnews.com or 481-6033.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 11 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
A vote against the regional cooperation agreement is a vote for the development patterns of the past 50 years.

I might be able to accept a no vote if those voting no had an alternative, but they don't.

Stopping development is unrealistic and illegal, so the natural growth coming our way will continue to be accommodated on large suburban lots which will in short order eat up our remaining agricultural land and doom us to ever increasing congestion.
prolanco
QUOTE(prolanco @ Jul 2 2008, 08:07 PM)
A vote against the regional cooperation agreement is a vote for the development patterns of the past 50 years.


No, it is not. Voting to adopt this plan has NO impact on whether Independence is approved or not. The comprehensive plan is not a zoning ordinance. Without adopting a regional plan, EHT would just need to spend money to update its own independent comprehensive plan.

I do see the regional plan as increasing the funding, size and scope of the LIMC, which I am not sure is really needed.

The Municipal Planning Code Section 303:
QUOTE
© Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, no action by the governing body of a municipality shall be invalid nor shall the same be subject to challenge or appeal on the basis that such action is inconsistent with, or fails to comply with, the provision of a comprehensive plan.
(d) Municipal zoning, subdivision and land development regulations and capital improvement programs shall generally implement the municipal and multimunicipal comprehensive plan or, where none exists, the municipal statement of community development objectives.
lee41
QUOTE(lee41 @ Jul 2 2008, 08:29 PM)


No, it is not. Voting to adopt this plan has NO impact on whether Independence is approved or not. The comprehensive plan is not a zoning ordinance. Without adopting a regional plan, EHT would just need to spend money to update its own independent comprehensive plan.

I do see the regional plan as increasing the funding, size and scope of the LIMC, which I am not sure is really needed.


I attended the meetings in the city. From what I recall, this comprehensive "plan" really does not have any teeth or impact on approvals for land development. It's basic premise is to give neighboring communities a voice in the process as it relates to their community.

This plan would not have made a difference with The Crossings or Independence. It's just a feel good co-op plan between 11 municipalities.
Kate
QUOTE(Kate @ Jul 2 2008, 09:53 PM)

I attended the meetings in the city. From what I recall, this comprehensive "plan" really does not have any teeth or impact on approvals for land development. It's basic premise is to give neighboring communities a voice in the process as it relates to their community.

This plan would not have made a difference with The Crossings or Independence. It's just a feel good co-op plan between 11 municipalities.


That's why everyone else approved it. It's just a piece of paper.
lee41
That's what any comprehensive plan is. A tool to be used by the community. The LIMC comp plan incorporates that tool among several communities allowing them to work in unison on projects and giving guidance for the give and take that can accomplish so much for neighboring municipalities. I can not accept the continuation of the old notion of complete seperation of municipalities. Its time that something helps total community participation in choices that are made for development.
Don't worry...everyone will still have their own ordinances (zoning, SALDO, etc..)

BigKahuna
Top Ads