Current Conditions
22°F - CLEAR
East Hempfield OKs growth pact
Intelligencer Journal
Published: Jul 03, 2008
00:57 EST
Landisville
By MICHAEL YODER, Staff

East Hempfield Township on Wednesday became the final municipality to approve an ordinance designed to look at growth issues in the greater Lancaster region.

By a 3-2 vote, the supervisors approved the Lancaster Inter-Municipal Committee implementation ordinance and agreement, creating a land-use advisory board to look at the development of the regional comprehensive plan Growing Together, adopted in 2006. The board delayed its vote on the ordinance almost a month after 10 LIMC members approved the measure.

Supervisor Brett Miller said he spent several weeks looking at the ordinance to make sure it did not create issues with the township's sovereignty, self-determination, control and accountability.

Miller said after he studied the document he was satisfied the land-use advisory board would not usurp any power from the township and there are provisions allowing municipalities to opt out of "Growing Together" if they feel it is not in their best interest to be a participant or amend the agreement.

"This is an agreement between municipalities and how we engage with one another," Miller said. "It is not a land-use ordinance. That is a key point."

Supervisor Heidi Wheaton voted against the ordinance, saying she felt wording in the document could be used in the future to implement high-density development.

"After years go by and something is adopted, there could be one intention and then people get involved down the road and things change, creating a different intention," she said.

"Without having it spelled out, it is subject to interpretation by other people and could have a lot of unintended consequences."

Along with East Hempfield, LIMC members are Lancaster city, the townships of East Lampeter, Lancaster, Manheim, Manor, West Hempfield and West Lampeter and the boroughs of East Petersburg, Millersville and Mountville.

John Ahlfeld, executive director of LIMC, attended the meeting to discuss the ordinance.

He said the lack of local control was the biggest discussion point among the committee, but the recommendations of the land-use advisory board are nonbinding.

Kathy Wasong, chairwoman of the Lancaster Township supervisors and an LIMC supporter, said the ordinance puts a mechanism in place to let surrounding municipalities know what is happening to plan for growth and infrastructure needs accordingly.

Wasong said Lancaster Township is bordered by seven municipalities and has a working relationship with some but not all of them.

"It would be really helpful if there was a sounding board so we can see what's coming down the pike," Wasong said.

E-mail: myoder@lnpnews.com


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 6 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE(justiceforall @ Jul 3 2008, 08:30 AM)
What a surprise Bretty boy changed his position. I'm sure he prayed over it. This guy is such a phony and he wants Katie True's Job!!!!!!!!!! Oh please.


I've been at the last few meetings recently and I'd say he should be nominated for an Academy Award after his performance last night. He had said in the past that he was worried about the Twp. losing control and if the vote took place he would vote against it. His "many hours" studying this were probably spent in a back room with the GOP godfathers and godmothers telling him to straighten up.

He sure looks like a candidate to me.
99cdm99
Congratulations East Hempfield Township Supervisors for making an intelligent and well informed decision. The planning for this plan stretches back at least 15 years and it would have been a huge setback for good planning in Lancaster County if EHT denied this. This is good for the Township and Lancaster County. EHT still has plenty of control on its future growth....this vote actually gives them more flexibility and control.

Mr. Miller can't win.....if he doesn't vote the way some township residents want.........then he's incompetent and corrupt. Lots of whiners and poor losers in EHT, but no surprise there, I'm getting used to it.

Based on Heidi Wheaton's current postions on growth management and land planning she has clearly shown she can't be taken seriously for any higher office (County Commissioner, State Rep, etc). I know she has her sights set on higher office, but she obviously doesn't have a clear understanding of what needs to be done to protect Lancaster County's farmland, open space and unique cultural assets.

Save-the-Land
Hear Hear
The only way Lancaster will grow and keep its character is if all the communities cooperate and work together. This is a very positive step in that direction.

jdp
QUOTE(Save-the-Land @ Jul 3 2008, 11:31 AM)
Based on Heidi Wheaton's current postions on growth management and land planning she has clearly shown she can't be taken seriously for any higher office (County Commissioner, State Rep, etc). I know she has her sights set on higher office, but she obviously doesn't have a clear understanding of what needs to be done to protect Lancaster County's farmland, open space and unique cultural assets.


Wheaton once again demonstrates a total disinterest in working with others, be it colleagues on the Board or officials in neighboring communities. There is nothing in the agreement that takes away any local control. Sll the agreement does is commit everyone to keeping each other informed and working together to address common regional problems.

prolanco
I do believe that people are fed up with the Wheaton faithful on LOL who have nothing to say but make snide remarks and make up false stories of corruption and wrongdoing in the township.
If they think this does their candidate any good they are sadly mistaken. People are catching onto their game. Their rants of investigations and prosecutions are nothing but a sad attempt to make everyone believe that their candidate is the almighty savior.
Its obvious that she doesn't have a clue what this documents role is in serving the township. She is more of an obstructionist than ever; and to what end? What the heck does this woman want? It certainly isn't to serve the community as she was elected to do.
Kudos to Miller for doing his homework in order to answer his own concerns. I notice that Mr. or mrs. 99 has nothing to come back with than their old standby "backroom". No one is buying it anymore Mr. 99. this is a victory for all residents of the township, and they need to remember which supervisors voted against it.
Now municipalities can actually work together to solve bordering issues.

BigKahuna
Top Ads