LancasterOnline.com:News:Water an issue for Crossings

Water an issue for Crossings

Planners of shopping center want changes

Jul 15, 2008 01:59 EST

Lancaster

By LARRY ALEXANDER, Staff

The complete text of this article is no longer available online.

Recent Posts

Showing 5 most recent comments out of 14 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article

QUOTE(ReaganRepublican @ Jul 16 2008, 08:12 AM)

This project is a 3-2 done deal (at best) in favor for the development unless residents are willing to grab their pitchforks, torches and support Keebler (which ain't happening - the world class shopping opportunities are too good).

Funny, with the cost of housing in EHT, electric and gas rates, not to mention having to travel out to work for most residents, one would think they wouldn't have the disposal income to care about world-class shopping opportunities. I know I sure don't, and my neighbors don't either.
Someone mentioned runoff ... I have had to wade out of the end of my driveway; the silly little troughs that line our streets are useless ... and lemme tell you, it makes shoveling/snowblowing/plowing out the end of the driveway a major PIA. Love our house, but wish it had a better planned layout.

Scout

QUOTE(DimBulb @ Jul 17 2008, 06:26 PM)

Lancaster is different.

Yep. The convention center will also prove us naysayers wrong, too.

ReaganRepublican

QUOTE(ReaganRepublican @ Jul 16 2008, 08:12 AM)

So .... that crafty MT Commissioner President Larry Downing put off the vote until they can sneak it through at a future meeting with less public attention. He learned well from his mentors who used to hold many of their public meetings at 7:00am.

High has Downing, Simpson and Flanigan in his pocket already. Castlebury has voted in the past both with and against big-developers - he could go either way. Keebler's the only commissioner on record as consistantly voting against the pushy big developers and shadowy backroom deals.

This project is a 3-2 done deal (at best) in favor for the development unless residents are willing to grab their pitchforks, torches and support Keebler (which ain't happening - the world class shopping opportunities are too good).

Republican huh?

The Logical One

QUOTE(The Logical One @ Jul 18 2008, 03:18 PM)

Republican huh?

It's not the party, it's the individuals.

Local Republican AND Democratic politicians and officials have been acting to support special interests, at the expense of taxpayers.

Greed, and the lust for power, transcends party affiliation.

Artie See

QUOTE(The Logical One @ Jul 18 2008, 03:18 PM)

Republican huh?

Thanks for playing.

andy__1000

View full comments | Comment on this article