Current Conditions
46°F - SUNNY
Wrong-way driver guilty in 3 deaths
Washington Boro woman pleads to Rt. 30 fatalities, had blood-alcohol level more than 3 times legal limit.
Lancaster New Era
Published: Jul 16, 2008
11:38 EST
Lancaster
By JANET KELLEY, Staff

Sarah L. Timblin
 
1 of 1
A Washington Boro woman faces a minimum of nine years in prison after pleading guilty in Lancaster County Court today to driving drunk and causing a fatal accident that left three men dead.

Sarah L. Timblin, 23, pleaded guilty to three counts of homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence of intoxicants for the accident on Route 30 near Park City Center in March.

Under Pennsylvania law, each charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of three years in prison, President Judge Louis J. Farina told Timblin, and because there were multiple victims, the sentences must be served consecutively.

Farina ordered a background investigation on Timblin, at the request of defense attorney Andrew Spade, before he imposes sentence at a later date.

Assistant District Attorney Todd Brown told the judge that the accident happened around 2:40 a.m. on March 11 when Timblin drove her sport utility vehicle down the wrong way of the Harrisburg Pike exit ramp and onto the eastbound lanes of Route 30, crashing head-on into an oncoming car.

All three people in the car — Inocente Sanchez, 40, his brother, Luis Sanchez, 45, and Marlin Banks, 47 — died at the scene, the judge was told. The three men, all from York, were on their way to work at the time of the accident, police said.

About three dozen members of the victims' families crowded into the spectator section of the courtroom this morning, along with several supporters of Timblin. All listened quietly to the brief proceeding, some dabbing tears from their eyes.

Timblin, who was arrested the day after the accident, has been held in Lancaster County Prison pending the outcome of her court case.

This morning, dressed in a black shirt, gray slacks and white shoes, Timblin only answered Farina's questions as to whether she understood her legal rights and what possible prison term she faces.
Related Topics


In addition to three counts of homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence of intoxicants, Timblin also faces sentencing for three additional counts of homicide by vehicle, two counts of driving under the influence of intoxicants, reckless driving and driving the wrong way on a roadway.

Typically in such cases, statements are made on behalf of the defendant and the victims at the time of sentencing.

At the time of the accident, police said Timblin, who was not seriously hurt, had a blood-alcohol content of 0.26 percent, which is more than three times the legal limit of 0.08 percent.

It was her second offense for drunken driving, according to records. In 2006, Timblin was arrested for drunken driving after police found her passed out behind the wheel of a van, which was still running but stuck on top of a curb on Columbia Avenue.


Staff writer Janet Kelley can be reached at jkelley@LNPnews.com or 481-6026.


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 39 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE(Sprawl @ Jul 16 2008, 08:07 PM)
My ideal sentence:

She should get the 51 years.

And then, as a condition of her sentence, she should have to have every single high school drivers ed class in the county come visit her in prison so she can explain to them what she has learned about responsibility and consequences.



Very good idea. She should show pictures, too.

EricC
QUOTE(Dragon @ Jul 16 2008, 08:10 PM)


Well excuse me for finding the innocent killing of people offensive, I guess I should just except that drunks should be able to drive with no consequences and if they kill my family I'll just chalk it up to a terrible mistake.....what an idiot.



Just wanting some consistancy out of people. If the innocent killing of people is offensive to you then don't stop at just drunk drivers who kill people. Include all the drivers who kill someone because they were not operating their vehicle safely. My cousin was killed last year because a woman closed her eyes for a second on a back road. He is no less dead because she wasn't drinking but she never spend a second in jail for it. She chose to get behind the wheel when she was too tired to drive just like this girl chose to get behind the wheel when she was too drunk to drive.
Scubabike420
QUOTE(Dragon @ Jul 16 2008, 08:06 PM)

Extreme? You serious? How many drunk drivers do you know that intend to kill people when they drive drunk? The focus should be on extreme indifference to the known hazards and risks of drunk driving. Not a single person alive can deny that they have never heard of the dangers of drunk driving and they should not be surprised when something like this happens.


It is difficult to conceive someone sitting at a bar or in a restaurant consuming drink after drink without them realizing things are different when they stand up to leave. Or even for someone today to sit down with that first drink...and feel fine...but get order the second...and still feel fine...so a third, etc.

In today's world there can be no viable excuse that permits drunk driving. (period.) A drunk who drives demonstrates their intent by the mear act of driving a vehicle that is the weapon. If that drunk driver gets home safely...good...they got lucky. However, if that drunk driver, who was more than 3 times the legal limit drunk, kills 3 people and lives, than that drunk driver must be held equally accountable for murdering 3 people. Our society cannot offer lenient sentences to drunk driver killers, for it does not serve to discourage the behavior.
EricC
QUOTE(EricC @ Jul 17 2008, 01:04 PM)


It is difficult to conceive someone sitting at a bar or in a restaurant consuming drink after drink without them realizing things are different when they stand up to leave. Or even for someone today to sit down with that first drink...and feel fine...but get order the second...and still feel fine...so a third, etc.

In today's world there can be no viable excuse that permits drunk driving. (period.) A drunk who drives demonstrates their intent by the mear act of driving a vehicle that is the weapon. If that drunk driver gets home safely...good...they got lucky. However, if that drunk driver, who was more than 3 times the legal limit drunk, kills 3 people and lives, than that drunk driver must be held equally accountable for murdering 3 people. Our society cannot offer lenient sentences to drunk driver killers, for it does not serve to discourage the behavior.


What do you propose we do about other traffic situations that do not involve alcohol but result in a death? In almost all cases some root cause can be identified. Distracted driving is the number one cause of accidents but still people use cell phones will driving. Shouldn't we be testing drivers for over the counter medications that carry a warning about causing drowsiness? How about those on sedatives such as xanax or anti-depressants.

I am all for holding drivers accountable but not just the drunk ones. Seems like the only drivers who show indifference are the people who are drunk and get behind the wheel. All others seem to fall in the catagory of unavoidable accident.
Scubabike420
QUOTE(Scubabike420 @ Jul 17 2008, 02:54 PM)


What do you propose we do about other traffic situations that do not involve alcohol but result in a death? In almost all cases some root cause can be identified. Distracted driving is the number one cause of accidents but still people use cell phones will driving. Shouldn't we be testing drivers for over the counter medications that carry a warning about causing drowsiness? How about those on sedatives such as xanax or anti-depressants.
I am all for holding drivers accountable but not just the drunk ones. Seems like the only drivers who show indifference are the people who are drunk and get behind the wheel. All others seem to fall in the catagory of unavoidable accident.


You make a very valid point. While it is often true that most accidents are attibutable to some root cause, those that usually result in death are truly a horrible, unavoidable accident or related to a consumed impairment. Someone who uses Xanax, for example, should know the risks associated with operating a motor vehicle. But I believe you are correct in that the ones who seem to show indifference are drunk.

EricC
Top Ads