Current Conditions
46°F - SUNNY
Teen killer's appeal denied
Judge rejects softer sentence, says Kreider dangerous, not sorry.
Lancaster New Era
Published: Jul 23, 2008
12:11 EST
Lancaster
By JANET KELLEY, Staff

Alec Kreider
 
1 of 1
Before Alec Kreider was sentenced for murdering three members of a Manheim Township family, he bragged to a fellow inmate that he would kill again "if given the opportunity."

Lancaster County Court Judge David Ashworth wants to make sure he never gets that chance.

This morning, Ashworth handed down an opinion rejecting the 17-year-old Kreider's request to reduce the sentence he imposed last month from three consecutive to three concurrent sentences of life in prison without parole.

The brutal murder of Tom and Lisa Haines, and their 16-year-old son, Kevin, in May 2007 horrified the Lancaster County community. The sole survivor of the family, the couple's daughter, Maggie, told police she ran from the house after seeing her parents mortally wounded and hearing her brother's screams.

The community's shock was compounded when police arrested the teenage victim's best friend.

In Pennsylvania, there is no parole for those sentenced to life in prison. Only the governor can offer a pardon.

Ashworth, in his sentence, noted that he would oppose any clemency for Kreider.

Three consecutive life sentences would mean three pardons from the governor — a highly unlikely possibility.

While the crime "evoked an array of emotions on the part of many people," Ashworth wrote that he reached his conclusion after "rational, detached and dispassionate reasoning based on the particular facts of this case."
Related Topics


"Quite simply the severity of (Kreider's) actions warranted the severity of the sentence," Ashworth wrote.

When Kreider pleaded guilty and was sentenced last month for the murders, Ashworth noted he allowed the teenager "no less than five opportunities" to speak to the family of the victims in the courtroom.

Kreider's "refusal to express any remorse after pleading guilty to three counts of first-degree murder was a sign of his character," and was taken into account when the judge decided whether to sentence him concurrently or consecutively for the crimes.

Ashworth wrote that he believed Kreider's "indifferent attitude toward the slaughter of three innocent people made him a poor candidate for rehabilitation and a danger to the community."

Defense attorney David Blanck, in writing the appeal, suggested that his client had the right to remain silent and the judge should not have held that against him.

"The reference to the 'lack of statements of the defendant,' was to his remorse for the homicides and not to the motive in this case, as erroneously suggested by the defendant," Ashworth wrote.

Ashworth quoted from the transcript of the sentencing proceeding, when he told Kreider, "Our laws do not require you to explain why you chose to kill these people. However, this community and, more importantly Maggie Haines and her family, deserve some explanation or insight into what could possibly cause a person to commit such a heinous and violent crime."

District Attorney Craig Stedman and Assistant District Attorney Kelly Sekula, in writing the prosecution's response to the appeal, asked for the consecutive life sentences to make "it clear that each one of these lives is important. Each one of these lives deserves special consideration and punishment."

"The facts, as admitted to by (Kreider), paint a horrific picture of the cold, calculating and unrelenting actions taken by (Kreider) to destroy the Haines family," Ashworth wrote.

Kevin Haines, Kreider's "self-described 'best friend,' suffered from over a dozen defensive wounds to his arms and hands indicating that he put up a significant struggle for his life before he gave it up, as a result of massive wounds to his throat and face," Ashworth wrote.

Mrs. Haines, who survived the initial abdominal stabbing long enough to send her daughter from the house, Ashworth wrote, "then endured the horror of having her attacker return to the bedroom to finish off the job by slashing her face."

"Mercifully," Ashworth continued, Tom Haines died quickly from a stab wound to the chest and Maggie escaped, physically unharmed.

"It is incongruous for (Kreider) to now complain about the severity of a sentence," Ashworth wrote, adding that in sentencing the defendant to consecutive terms he was taking into consideration Kreider's statement that he would kill again if given the opportunity.

"This Court firmly believes what (Kreider) has said and will not afford him any opportunity to kill again."

In Pennsylvania, juveniles charged with murder are treated the same as adults in court and prison. Kreider is currently at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill.


Staff writer Janet Kelley can be reached at
jkelley@LNPnews.com or 481-6026.


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 50 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE(Faulkner @ Jul 24 2008, 05:38 PM)


I'm not sure what Eric is trying to say with his posts, but yours made his seem utterly rational.

What world do you live in?


Thanks.
QUOTE(AngelFace @ Jul 24 2008, 09:04 PM)


There are legal standards for a plea of insanity. His lawyer would have plead that way if Kreider had met the standards. The standard is not mental impairment. Truth be told, 98% of the population has some degree of mental impairment, whether depression, anxiety, stress level, IQ level, etc.!!! The standard is INSANITY. And insanity means the person did not know right from wrong, is incapable of understanding the charges against him/her, and cannot aid in their own defense. The minute a defendant runs, hides, covers their crime, they demonstrate they knew it was wrong. Talk to any lawyer. It is TOUGH to prove insanity. And you are right, License, all the planning and premeditation pretty much settled the first degree murder charge.


Actually, the meaning of legally insane does not mean crazy. A person found to be legally insane at the time of the crime, may very well be able to understand the charges against him/her and aid in their defense. Making the conclusion is a "Monday Morning Quarterback" interpretation of the defendant's state of mind at the time of the crime.

EricC
Fortunately the death penalty cannot be imposed on a minor so weighing the costs of executing Alec Kreider vs. the costs of life time imprisonment is a moot point.

For anyone who believes the Haines family would get some sense of closure from Alec's torture/death in prison, you're only kidding yourself. For anyone to wish the horrors of torture, sexual assault, or murder in prison against Alec Kreider (or any inmate) should really evaluate their own conscience and seek professional help.

As for the present case, v. Alec Kreider, thorough research into the record yields numerous points yet to be settled. I don't think this is over with this latest opinion from Judge Ashworth.

Time will tell...

EricC
FYI--

web link:
Special Pa. Prison Houses 16 Teenage Killers - Pennsylvania News Story - WGAL Lancaster
http://www.wgal.com/news/17021152/detail.html
Daisy Lee Myers
QUOTE(EricC @ Jul 25 2008, 05:10 PM)

Thanks.
Actually, the meaning of legally insane does not mean crazy. A person found to be legally insane at the time of the crime, may very well be able to understand the charges against him/her and aid in their defense. Making the conclusion is a "Monday Morning Quarterback" interpretation of the defendant's state of mind at the time of the crime.

The three standards I listed are three standards the courts use to determine "incapacity". As for Monday Morning Quarterback, in order to use an insanity defense, there is a court-ordered psychiatric examination. Then, when it is the duelling experts, defense shrink vs. the State's shrink, the judge makes the call.
AngelFace
Alec Kreider, who is facing three life sentences for killing the Haines family, will likely go there soon.

The facility is specifically designed for young men like these two.

Dr. Joseph Mazer-Kevich has run Pine Grove since the first inmates came 8 years ago.

Juvenile Inmates Treated Differently

"We have a population of approximately 750 inmates. Three hundred of which are classified as young adult offenders," said superintendent Joseph Mazurkiewicz.

Young adult offenders are those under the age of 18 who commit serious offenses.

Some have even been as young as 14.

For many, this is their first time in prison.

"They've committed some type of felony to be here and we understand that, we recognize it and we address it. But in the big picture, we have to realize that they are adolescent and they are juvenile," said Don Bachota, the program manager.

web link:

http://www.wgal.com/news/17021152/detail.html
Daisy Lee Myers
Top Ads