Current Conditions
34°F - P/CLOUDY
Trash hauler's suit against city on track
Intelligencer Journal
Published: Jul 29, 2008
01:15 EST
Lancaster
By JENNIFER TODD, Staff

The attorney for Lancaster trash hauler Willie Shell Sr. said Monday that a ruling on his client's lawsuit against the city of Lancaster is expected in early 2009. Briefs in the case are on track to be filed by November or December, with a decision expected by February, according to Luther E. Weaver III of L.E. Weaver & Associates, Philadelphia.

Shell filed suit in federal court in Philadelphia last August, claiming his civil rights were violated when the city initiated a single-hauler trash-collection system in 2006.

Shell, an independent hauler, owns and operates Shell's Disposal and Recycling, 640 S. Franklin St.

The nine-count suit charges that city officials were illegally canceling contracts and transferring Shell's customers to the city's designated hauler, York Waste Management, Weaver said. Named in the suit are the city of Lancaster, Mayor Rick Gray, City Council, the Department of Public Works and its director, Charlotte Katzenmoyer, the city's Bureau of Solid Waste and Recycling and its manager, Michael J. Devaney, and Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority and its executive director, James Warner.

According to a news release, Shell recently prepared to seek an injunction to keep the city from converting any more of his customers to the city's system while the case is in the court system.

A hearing on the motion was scheduled for Wednesday but Shell agreed to withdraw the request after the city showed that none of Shell's existing customers have contracts with termination or renewal dates before 2011, the release states. The ordinance states that existing contracts with independent haulers will be honored until their expiration or renewal dates, Weaver said.

Shell deferred all comment to his attorney Monday.

Gray said Monday the city maintains the suit is "without merit" and said the city continues to have problems with Shell independent of the case.

Those issues, he said, include failure to make timely payments on more than $300,000 in city low-interest economic development loans — dating back to 1995 — and consistent failure to comply with zoning regulations.

E-mail: jtodd@lnpnews.com


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 20 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE(Hope @ Jul 30 2008, 01:29 PM)

Oh, well then, with that logic... I have to see your name on this board so I think you're an idiot!


like I care..
buck rogers
QUOTE(buck rogers @ Jul 30 2008, 01:37 PM)

like I care..


wouldn't have expected any other response
Hope
QUOTE(Artie See @ Jul 30 2008, 01:14 PM)
You are most certainly welcome to your own opinion.

We live in downtown Lancaster. I had switched to York Waste after Waste Management had raised their rates once too often. Besides being less expensive, York Waste's service was clearly superior than Waste Management's, with fewer missed deliveries, and less loose trash left on the street. Since the single-hauler plan was put into effect, I can now put out twice as many trash bags for less money. That is a good deal, no matter how you look at it.


Artie, that may be true in your neighborhood but, it's not true for a lot of the city. I am talking about the Cabbage Hill area, namley Dorwart and Lafayette Sts.
stanwills
I'll be happy when all trash is picked up on the same day at nearly the same time so trash cans aren't decorating the streets on multiple days. Regarding the quality of service of York: I find my neighbors' trash cans scattered in front of my house and mine scattered in pieces as well (lids here, cans there). It seems to me the City should be able to enforce better standards with York since it's easier to identify the culprit!!

CityNeighbor
QUOTE(Hope @ Jul 30 2008, 01:42 PM)

wouldn't have expected any other response


ok Mr. smarty pants
buck rogers
Top Ads