Current Conditions
26°F - SUNNY
Kennel owner won't heel
State Ag Department files lawsuit to keep West Earl man from selling dogs.
Sunday News
Published: Sep 07, 2008
00:21 EST
West Earl
By CHIP SMEDLEY, Staff
The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture is using what it hopes will be a more effective tool to rein in one of the county's more defiant dog breeders.
This building houses Ervin Zimmerman's kennel and dog breeding operation at 400 Metzler Road in West E...(more)
 
1 of 2
 
2 of 2

Early last month the department filed a civil lawsuit against the owner of a West Earl Township kennel, Ervin Zimmerman, whose license to maintain a kennel and dog breeding operations was revoked in November 2007.

The state initiated the lawsuit when state dog wardens visited Zimmerman's property on the 400 block of Metzler Road Aug. 4 and discovered, according to the complaint, t "Defendant had 193 dogs on the premises which he continues to breed and sell."

Susan West, director of the state Department of Agriculture's Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement, said the civil lawsuit represents "our best tool to get to the end result in the fastest manner."

If the bureau had filed a criminal lawsuit, West said, "it could take up to a year to go to trial and he would be able to operate that entire time."

The civil lawsuit calls for an injunction that would close the kennel and levy fines up to $500 for each day that he continues to operate without a license.

"This will help us expedite matters," West said. "It provides emergency relief until the whole matter is settled."

However, West said, the lawsuit will not be heard until a judge rules on a lawsuit Zimmerman has filed at the federal level.

"He is also licensed by the USDA [United States Department of Agriculture]," West explained, "and he believes the state laws are in conflict with the federal laws."

That hearing, West said, is scheduled for later this month.

West said Zimmerman is one of her department's more problematic owners. "He appeals every step of the way," she said.

While the use of civil lawsuits by the department is not new, said agriculture department spokesman Chris Ryder, they are not used often because "we don't have that many cases where we have to go to court. Usually, once we charge an unlicensed kennel they close.

"In this case, Mr. Zimmerman operates" despite agriculture department actions and adverse legal decisions against him.

Zimmerman's farm and kennel is about two miles north of Brownstown on Metzler Road and visible from Route 222.

The large, white, stone farmhouse is shaded by trees and sits near a red barn and other outbuildings. Its fields extend across Metzler Road.

The kennel/breeding operation is housed in a 1½-story building to the rear of his barns. Exhaust fans provide ventilation to the small structure, constructed of a combination of concrete block and wood, all painted white.

Zimmerman's 2007 license was revoked after his kennel failed seven inspections between June 5 and Oct. 11, 2007.

According to the complaint, Zimmerman — despite the 2007 revocation — filed an application for a 2008 kennel license this past January. The dog law bureau rejected his application and Zimmerman appealed that decision.

Feb. 22, 2008, state Secretary of Agriculture Dennis Wolff stayed the denial, allowing Zimmerman to continue his kennel and breeding operations until the appeal could be heard. That hearing took place June 24, and after reviewing testimony, Wolff re-affirmed the denial July 25, leaving Zimmerman without a license to operate his kennel.

In May of this year, Lancaster County Judge Howard F. Knisely found Zimmerman guilty of 10 counts of animal cruelty and five counts of violating state dog laws. Zimmerman was fined $1,500 plus court costs for the animal cruelty convictions and $425 plus costs for the dog law violations.

During the trial it was revealed that Zimmerman, in 2007, had kept more than 220 dogs in 50 cages at his kennel. During the Nov. 3, 2007, inspection, dog wardens seized 18 dogs, including a puppy whose hind feet had been chewed off, dogs with wounds from fighting, and dogs with infected gums, ears and feet.

Officers also reported that it took them 30 minutes to track down Zimmerman, who ran from inspectors when they arrived.

A woman who answered the phone at Zimmerman's property Friday said Ervin Zimmerman was working in his field. When asked if he would want to discuss the lawsuit, she said, "No, he wouldn't want to do that."

In a related development last week, an advisory council of the Pennsylvania Professional Dog Breeders Association filed a lawsuit against the state's Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement for selectively targeting Lancaster County kennels for inspection.

An incident involving state kennel inspector Kristin Donmoyer during the November inspection at Zimmerman's kennel is highlighted in the lawsuit. Donmoyer is listed as a defendant.

The lawsuit alleges Donmoyer "blatantly" violated the rights of kennel volunteer Carl Gilgore, who was videotaping the inspection, when Donmoyer allegedly threatened him with arrest. Gilgore was not arrested and continued videotaping the inspection.

In announcing the lawsuit, Bob Yarnall, president of the American Canine Association Inc. said, "Since 2006 the governor has directed the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture to target commercial kennel operators and to find reasons to shut legitimate businesses down."

Yarnall said: "Based on the department's annual report to the General Assembly, in the year 2007 kennel operators in Lancaster County were more than three times more likely to be inspected, more than 10 times more likely to be cited for violations and over 100 times more likely to receive a warning," than kennel operators in other counties.

He concluded, "There is an undeniable pattern of abuse by the Department of Agriculture in enforcing regulations and the law that is intended to protect all dogs — not just dogs in one part of the state."



Chip Smedley is a staff writer for the Sunday News. E-mail him at csmedley@lnpnews.com.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 30 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
Actually, I don't think you're right at all. I simply can't post what I do think of you. Not if I want to keep my posting privileges, anyway.

You're arguing for the freedom to keep animals in suboptimal conditions for profit. Unbelievable. Maybe you're a puppy-miller yourself! I can't think of any other reason to be so stridently in favor of people like the Zimmermans.
reese
Reese,

Some people will never change. I wouldn't waste my breath. rockin good post. Hopefully next week we will hear some good news from Harrisburg.

Legislation (H.B. 2525), backed by Governor Rendell and supported by more than 90 legislators, has been introduced to overhaul Pennsylvania's regulation of breeding facilities. Pennsylvania is widely considered to be a haven for puppy mills, and it is time to put an end to this cruelty. This bill has passed a House committee and now awaits action on the House floor.

Makita
You know, I was kind of digging Mikerob's views on being able to do whatever you want with what's on your property, but the others seem to have better points on taking responsibility for not allowing living things to suffer unnecessarily. Hmm, I guess I better get home and feed the kids now.

catgrr8
Here's a novel approach! Put all the corrupt puppy mill owners in kennels in Penn Square. That could take the place of the new convention center (future gambling casino). What a great tourist attraction.
cyberia
Well that's sad to hear Reese, that you can't post what you really think of me, seeing you don't know me or ever met me, and have come to some conclusion that I'm arguing for corrupt puppy mills and their practices,but to tell you the truth, I'm not arguing for anything, I like everybody else that post here, am just stating my opinion, but fools like yourself can't handle it, and you've shown that by what you say towards me and my opinion. IT"S AN OPINION NOT A FACT!!!!!...

And saying I'm arguing to keep animals in suboptimal conditions, I'm not arguing for this type of freedom, and if you read my post like I stated, you would of seen where i said I wasn't for this zimmermans way of treating these puppies, and not only did I state this in the first sentence of my post but also at the end of the same post, but apparently your over looked that part so you can try and give somebody crap about their OPINION in a post they wrote. The only thing i can say is that it must be your time of the month and that's ok! but do me one favor, GET OVER IT !!!

Oh catgrr8 thanks for digging some of my points of view, and I'm for responsible people also such as yourself, but the way some on here think, you'd think I was praising this kennel owner for treating his pups poorly, which isn't the case at all, but then I guess my opinions don't count because I see things in a different light then some others even though I'm not perfect, as some think they are on TB.
Mikerob
Top Ads