I think it's comical that the document was noted as being "littered with adjectives advocating home rule" as opposed to saying "riddled with adjectives..." .. I love a good pun and backhanded remarks.

From the article, it appears this decision was made outside a public meeting. Is this another Sunshine Law violation?

The mailer actually reads like a piece of campaign literature. The wording clearly advocates voting in favor of the so-called "home rule" proposal.

This provides strong evidence that those behind the so-called "home rule" proposal have a hidden agenda of their own. What are they trying to hide from us?