Current Conditions
26°F - SUNNY
Cougar attack doc: 'I believe the guy'
Says man’s wounds real, contradicts state game officials.
Lancaster New Era
Published: Oct 22, 2008
11:34 EST
Lancaster
By AD CRABLE, Staff Writer
Dr. Michael Reihart saw the shredded shirt, the cuts and abrasions on the farmer's chest, arms and face — even between the eyes.

The Lancaster General Hospital emergency room doctor who treated Samuel Fisher on Oct. 9 believes him when he says he was attacked by a cougar that jumped from a tree in Sadsbury Township.

"Part of my job is to figure out what is actual," Reihart says. "I don't think they (injuries) could be self-inflicted. This guy seemed genuine from the very beginning.

"I believe the guy," he says.

So convinced was the doctor with 25 years of emergency room experience that he immediately urged authorities to go to the scene.

Reihart's comments, along with those of a Colerain Township supervisor and a sportsmen's group, contradict a ruling by the state Game Commission that the cougar-sighting was a hoax.

In new developments in the wake of the alleged attack, Walt Todd, the chairman of Colerain supervisors, said he believes a cougar visited his property about six weeks ago and left claw marks on a piece of tin "that were very close to what I saw on (Fisher's) arm." Colerain Township borders southern Sadsbury Township.

And the Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania on Tuesday issued a report on the incident, saying the sportsmen's group "is standing by the Christiana Amish community and their numerous reports of mountain lion sightings."

Game Commission spokesman Jerry Feaser said today the agency continues to believe the cougar attack was a hoax and that Fisher, of 92 Windy Top Road, Christiana, is lying when he said he saw three cougars, shot one and wrestled another, which only fled when it was stabbed by Fisher's pocketknife.
Related Topics

On Tuesday, the Game Commission pulled its bear traps from the area in an attempt to catch a cougar.

However, Amish in the Ninepoints area remain frightened and vigilant.

"Some of the Amish have a gun with them all the time now," says Stephen Mohr, of Bainbridge, Unified's president.

Added Todd, "I can tell you the Amish are very concerned about the safety of their kids going to school."

Tuesday night, nearly 300 people, mostly Amish, attended a community meeting at the Bart Township Fire Hall that was called by USP to discuss the cougar sightings. Another is planned for tonight for Strasburg-area Amish.

At Tuesday's community meeting, several people wanted to know if they can shoot a cougar if they see one.

No, not unless it's threatening someone, replied Dennis Warfel, the Game Commission's wildlife conservation officer for southern Lancaster County.

If the animal does pose a danger to someone, "then you need to do what you need to do to protect yourself," Warfel said.

However, Mohr predicted local farmers would shoot one on sight, fine or no fine.

Warfel also said he doesn't believe Fisher's tale. He cited alleged blood samples taken at the scene that a lab found were not blood, and the fact that Fisher's wounds weren't more serious — none required stitches — after a several-minute tussle with a cougar.

He also said there were no signs of a cougar found anywhere in the area.

Mohr said that if the cougar that attacked Fisher was once a pet or captive animal, it would have dull claws.

Reihart, who later accompanied Fisher back to his farm for a re-enactment of the events, says he has seen wounds from house cats and dogs and the injuries he saw were not from either.

"I have no idea how these wounds occurred," he says. "At some point, you have to trust your patient. Quite a few people have seen cougars in the area.

The physician says Fisher seemed genuine and honest.

Reihard says he talked to residents in the community who said Fisher "was not known to tell tall tales.

"The other thing for me is he said to me, 'Why would I fake this story? This is a busy time of year. I am a farmer and I have better things to do.'"


Staff writer Ad Crable can be reached at acrable@LNPnews.com or 481-6029.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 30 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE (Nativeson @ Oct 22 2008, 10:39 PM)
Sorry Beth. That was a carryover from a cat thread between Spaylady and I. Our next door neighbor has seen coyotes on his property on several occasions. Two were seen just 150 yards from our house in Rapho Twp. Come to think of it, coyotes eat cats, don't they? Nature is so violent!

Thank you for the clarification, I was fairly certain you wouldn't be an advocate for the dangerous cats to be randomly released among us.

The reintroduction of some of these predators has created concern for livestock holders. Of course when food gets scarce for them they will hunt out the next easiest. Calves, lambs, cats, small pets, children, hikers, etc.

You are right about the coyotes they are in among us. More and closer than most think.
Beth
QUOTE (Beth @ Oct 23 2008, 12:06 PM)
Thank you for the clarification, I was fairly certain you wouldn't be an advocate for the dangerous cats to be randomly released among us.

The reintroduction of some of these predators has created concern for livestock holders. Of course when food gets scarce for them they will hunt out the next easiest. Calves, lambs, cats, small pets, children, hikers, etc.

You are right about the coyotes they are in among us. More and closer than most think.


Death does not have to be the answer for these large cats if they exist either. If , as I suspect (if there is any truth to the witnessing) I believe they are EX 'exotic pets' (either legal or illegal) & there ARE resources for such. (exotic animal rescues and so forth.)

There is no need for people to go in 'attack mode' themselves over these random sightings.

All we have so far is a horse who had an injury on its head (of which no animal in particular has been proven to have did it) and Samuel Fisher who claims he was attacked and has injuries to prove it (tho many believe they would be far greater.) Strangely, nothing else evidence wise has come forth~no cougar hair, no cougar blood...and the one reported blood trail proved to be fake. (right?)

The game commission has issued warning that anyone who shoots an animal of this sort WITHOUT it being self defense will be fined. I agree with them on this.

Frankly, at this time of year you have more chance of getting injured/killed on the road as deer run from hunters on the road...just saying...put your fears in perspective.
spaylady
QUOTE (spaylady @ Oct 22 2008, 04:22 PM)
I don't know anything about that. The more I find out the more confused I get!! Now the doc believes his attack really happened...and it IS hard to believe someone would rip their clothes and simulate an attack to such a degree. ..Im leaning on believing its an 'ex pet' cougar. One who was not hell bent on KILLING the man....perhaps even had some claws filed down/or missing. Some exotic pet owners even have their wild animal pets defanged.

I await a future UFO sighting/abduction.. :-p


It's not that hard to believe at all. Some people want attention, others have personality disorders that make them tell tales. Who knows what the truth is?
reese
QUOTE (reese @ Oct 23 2008, 08:26 PM)
It's not that hard to believe at all. Some people want attention, others have personality disorders that make them tell tales. Who knows what the truth is?

Clarification on the behavioral treatment facility question: The latest word was that Fisher was evaluated by one and deemed to not need treatment. I for one am glad to hear that he wasn't admitted for treatment as first rumored.
Just to make sure I understand the game commission's stance on the rules of engagement: If a cougar was spotted roaming the halls of their office building in Harrisburg would there be any chance he'd be shot on sight? That's what I thought.
Nativeson
QUOTE (Nativeson @ Oct 23 2008, 10:17 PM)
Clarification on the behavioral treatment facility question: The latest word was that Fisher was evaluated by one and deemed to not need treatment. I for one am glad to hear that he wasn't admitted for treatment as first rumored.
Just to make sure I understand the game commission's stance on the rules of engagement: If a cougar was spotted roaming the halls of their office building in Harrisburg would there be any chance he'd be shot on sight? That's what I thought.


I wasn't even thinking about the allegations of his treatment, to be honest. My comment was made in general. The truth is there are people who make up stories for one reason or another. Whether or not this was true is Fisher's case, IDK.
reese
Top Ads