QUOTE (RonHarper @ Dec 2 2008, 10:12 AM)
Reminds me of the shot gun video I saw a few years ago - it was a $1,000+ variety. The guy threw five clay birds with his left hand and shot them one handed. They paused the video and the narration said, "Notice that the first shell did not hit the ground before the last shell was discharged."!
The salesman said, "That skill doesn't come with the gun!"
Those guys are amazing, there's a dude who does trick shooting with a pistol, firing something like 12 rounds a second (if the six-shooter held that many). Absolutely amazing.
There's also a guy who does similar stuff with a whip.
Unfortunately, I don't know either of their names.
QUOTE (RonHarper @ Dec 2 2008, 10:12 AM)
I don't hunt but I always think this long-range hunting isn't hunting at all. The deer doesnt' have a chance. The bow-hunting at least levels the playing field but the chances of a non-fatal injury increase dramatically as hunter take shots they never should take.
I agree, it's not "sporting" if the deer has no chance.
I don't hunt, too much work. However, I always got a kick out of people who insisted that the accuracy I had (it's been 10+ years since I handled a firearm or bow) with my compound bow was only because of the sights.
So I'd bet them $10 (tank of gas to a HS kid) that I could do the same without the sights. And I would. They didn't know I only mounted the sight because it came with the bow.
QUOTE (Rural Conservative @ Dec 2 2008, 10:56 AM)
a greater challenge....maybe I should get an atl atl.
It's valid during archery season, there's a few people who have insane accuracy with those primative weapons.
It's basically a spear on a hi-li shaped stick. Lots of power, accuracy for the unpracticed, not so much.
QUOTE (Rural Conservative @ Dec 2 2008, 10:56 AM)
My response was intended to simply clear up some misconceptions about the capabilities of current shotgun slugs. IMO, simply because it can be done, does not mean it should be done.
Very, very true.
QUOTE (crazycatwoman @ Dec 2 2008, 01:03 PM)
I've tasted groundhog once as a child (at my Dad's insistence). I DOESN'T taste anything like chicken !!!
QUOTE (Pericles @ Dec 2 2008, 02:41 PM)
If there's four legs and no wings, it ain't chicken.
I've had lots of varied unusal game meat, my favorite is venison sticks (like a slim-jim but tastes good), emu and rattlesnake.
Aside from those, alligator has a fish texture but a flavor that's not chicken, but could pass for poultry if it weren't for the fish texture. Bear is like tough beef, again it has a unique flavor and I've been told it depends on when the bear was taken, sweeter in late spring when the bears have been eating sugary stuff like berries.
Squirell, rabbit anything else that small is not worth eating, too many bones and doesn't taste all that great.
Beef: tastes like shotgun pellets. Lead shotgun pellets none the less. Seriously, got some store bought beef one time with two shot gun pellets in it. I should have sued and started the tampered food craze.
Pretzels: tastes like pretzels, has the texture of teeth. I broke one of my wisdom teeth eating a pretzel once (I have minimal sensitivity in my teeth, about a dozen fillings, novicane for two of them). I'm chewing the pretzel and I get this really, really hard piece of salt, so I spit it out, there was a tooth fragment in it. YUCK! So I threw out the bag. That would have been a hilarious lawsuit. Expert witness (dentist) is called to the stand. "Your honor, upon examination of the defendant's X-rays, we've found the tooth fragment to be the defendant's." "Case dismissed, dumbass."