QUOTE (UDelawareBH @ Dec 5 2008, 03:30 PM)
Fact of the matter is, Pennsylvania has low tolls already. Trying crossing the GW bridge at $9 per trip. We also have one of the worst bridge ratings in the country (admittedly due to the age factor, PA being one of the older states in our great nation).
Our options are limited-- either raise state taxes on EVERYONE, or tax (toll) those who USE the facilities heaviest to recover some much needed money for investment in the infrastructure as a whole. With the extra revenue, we can improve the turnpike everyone complains about, improve the bridges that are a safety risk, and smooth the rides everyone complains about. We can widen intersections and better traffic congestion. It's common sense. I know people don't like paying that extra 50 cents to travel 75 miles to work, but honestly-- we should be taxing you for your unnecessary greenhouses gases and carbon monoxide to/from work every day, and put it towards healthcare. Luckily your already forced to pay additional in gas tax.
Maybe if we made it cost prohibitive to commute long distances by vehicles, the infrastructure wouldn't take such a beating, there wouldn't be so much road rage, there would be less traffic, there wouldn't be so much pollution, there would be less demand for gas (ie, lower prices overall), and lastly-- people would have to spend more time with their families and less for work purposes (what a novel idea).
First, this isn't about maintaining the turnpike. This is about taxing turnpike users to subsidize the maintenance of roads and bridges outside of the turnpike system. Second, PA already collects more than enough money to maintain its infrastructure. It just chooses to spend that money on other things. An even bigger problem is tax money collected by the federal government and then re-distributed for road and bridge work. This should not be a function of the federal government. Let that money stay in the states where it belongs.