Current Conditions
31°F - CLOUDY
Veterinarian cited for cruelty
Accused of amputating puppy’s tail without anesthesia
Intelligencer Journal
Apr 02, 2009 01:48 EST
New Providence
By SUSAN E. LINDT, Staff Writer

The complete text of this article is no longer available online.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 126 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE (Chance @ Apr 6 2009, 06:14 PM)
Mom cat showed up with five kittens. Found homes for all but two of the kittens. Two visits to the vet for all the shots spay and nuetered came to $610. I knew it would be expensive but wasn't expecting that. People think getting a pet at the Humane League is expensive but it is definitly a bargain. If you can't afford their price you can't afford an animal. Humane League has rules to weed out people that really should not have an animal and may just be looking to adopt on impulse. They know what is available and what would best suit a family. Listen to them. So many rescue groups out there that take certain breeds. If looking for a certain breed check out pet finders. Have patience when looking for a family pet. Don't go to a shelter expecting to bring home a dog. It may take several trips but you will know when you meet the right one. Use your head not your heart. Both animal and family will be better off. If you live in an apartment that allows pets and you have to move you will be limited to ones that allow pets. Are you willing to find a new one that will allow pets. It will take some searching. These animals depend on us but what they give back is ten fold. They are not something you get to make your life better for a few weeks then decide they are too much work and want to get rid of.


amen! I do consider both dogs we have adopted from the League a 'bargain'. When we are ready to adopt again Im quite sure the Humane League will be the place we go.
spaylady
Animal Protection Coalition Asks Court to Uphold New Pennsylvania Puppy Mill Law
April 3, 2009

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Friday, a coalition of humane organizations filed a "friend of the court" brief in a lawsuit brought by the Professional Dog Breeders Advisory Council ("PDBAC") challenging Pennsylvania's Act 119 of 2008.

The groups include The Humane Society of the United States, The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, The Humane League of Lancaster County, Main Line Animal Rescue, Pennsylvania Legislative Animal Network, The Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and New Jersey Consumers Against Pet Shop Abuse.

Act 119 amended Pennsylvania's Dog Law to require that puppy mills comply with basic humane requirements in the care of the dogs kept in their facilities.

Gov. Ed Rendell signed the legislation in October after a long campaign that generated national media attention. It was enacted to address the deplorable conditions present in Pennsylvania's numerous commercial dog-breeding operations, including filthy stacked wire cages where breeding dogs may spend their entire lives, total lack of exercise for the dogs and inadequate or no veterinary care.

The Act addresses these problems by, among other things, creating new standards for cage size, eliminating wire flooring which damages dogs' feet, mandating exercise opportunities for the dogs and requiring regular veterinary care. Raids of puppy mills last year — including one in late September that was reputedly the largest in state history — had shown the critical need for stronger regulation of less-than-reputable kennels. Pennsylvania has been tarnished with the reputation of being one of the worst puppy mill states in the nation.

The PDBAC claims that Act 119 infringes on its members' constitutional rights, and that commercial breeders should be immune from inspection of their facilities. In their brief to the court, the groups explain that the Constitution unquestionably permits the State to regulate this industry for the benefit of the dogs, and to inspect the facilities to ensure that the facilities are in compliance with the minimal requirements in the law.

Statements from the organizations filing the brief:

"Puppy mills have been a hidden industry in Pennsylvania for too long," said Kathleen Summers, director of the puppy mills campaign for The Humane Society of the United States. "Truly reputable breeders know that puppy mills give their fancy a black eye; they should stand up for Act 119 and the protections it provides for dogs."

"Pennsylvania's citizens and the state legislature spoke loudly and clearly last October," said Cori A. Menkin, senior director of legislative initiatives for the ASPCA. "We believe that there is no merit to the claims made by the PDBAC, and it is just a last ditch attempt at derailing these much-needed and long-overdue changes to Pennsylvania's Dog Law."

"This lawsuit brought by the Professional Dog Breeders Advisory Council to avoid complying with the new Dog Law is not a Constitutional argument, but a pathetic attempt to keep the status quo in commercial kennels," said Mary Jo McClain of the Pennsylvania Legislative Animal Network.

"We are pleased to be part of this coalition supporting the enforcement of Act 119, a long overdue step towards eliminating cruel and inhumane breeding practices in Pennsylvania," said Joan E. Brown, president of Humane League of Lancaster County.

Slyasafox-they are done putting up with the extreme cruelty of these mills.
Chance
QUOTE (Chance @ Apr 2 2009, 01:18 PM)
Pretty sure I know who you are. Sorry for ending it abrubtly but we were wasting our time there and I was getting ticked. A main problem besides the Ag Committee is the Bureau of Dog Law. The Bureau of Dog Law doesn't enforce the laws we already have and THAT'S the biggest part of the problem.
As long as Dog Law refuses to do their job and close these he!! holes down, it doesn't even matter that 2525 passed - new laws won't help if the people who have the power to shut these places down turn a blind eye to animal cruelty and behave as though they're glorified building inspectors.


It is my understanding that the U.S.D.A. is responsible for these inspections and they have their hands full with inspecting meat plants, circus animal violations, farms,etc. One inspector had a journalist in tow, and the Mennonite puppy mill operator, took a rifle out along with a vicious german shepard and threatened her off the property! Our government doesn't provide enough funding to hire more people to inspect these Hell Holes! (Let's see if I get a couple of exclamation points to cover up the word Hell!) What I would like to know, and maybe someone can help me out here, is this! Who is making this puppy mill business so lucrative? These a-holes are making so much money off of these dogs, they are paying off everybody! Politicians, judges, vets. Lancaster is a breeding ground for two reasons, the Amish, who don't give a crap about animals, not to mention their daughters who get raped on a daily basis by fathers, brothers, and dare I say Bishops! Lancaster is a major trucking hub because of it's location, 2 hours from several major cities, New York, Baltimore, New Jersey, Philly, and many more. Who is buying these dogs? Labratories? Unknowing families looking for a cute pet? These mills are bringing in 500,00 a year and more in most cases, but whose buying the dogs?
I find it hard to believe it is simply pet stores, because most people I know with dogs have stopped getting their pets that way.In fact, that practice fell by the wayside years ago, and yet the profits continue to flow. Some great writer needs to write a screenplay about all of this, not Paris Hilton's Beverly Hills Chihuahua, which just brings more wrong attention to the problem, when kids insist on one after seeing how cute they are! No, what we need is someone to write a screenplay about the Amish and yes Mennonite puppy mills! A movie where the hero sneaks a camera into those barns, and films the horror. Someone who follows the trucks and finds out where all the puppies end up. With all the surveillance these days, that shouldn't be so hard to do. You don't even want to hear what I would like to do to Samuel King. But, let's just say I was writing the screenplay. Let's just say, we had him all roped up and in front of the cages. And then we let the dogs out. Let's just say there wouldn't be much left of the pious guy. You know,as Weird Al Yankovic says, in his infamous song, Amish Paridise, "I'm the guy all the omelettes wanna be like, on my knees scoring points for the afterlife". I personally like the song, "Who let the dogs out?"
hjohnston12
One problem is the internet. There is a large website that when you see a puppy in your area you call and they direct you to the place. Turns out it's a puppy mill and the Amish guy brings the puppy out of the barn for you to see. HSUS has a lawsuit against Petland and the guy that goes around collecting the puppies from these farms. They filed it on behalf of several people that bought puppies from them that had serious medical problems. They have it on their website along with a place others can tell their stories about puppies bought from them. Seems they are getting a lot of horror stories.
Chance
quote ...ESPECIALLY a purebred, given that most purebred dogs are less healthy (predisposed to various diseases and conditions associated with their breed), less intelligent, and less emotionally stable than mutts. Mutts live longer and have fewer problems overall. ...

This is wrong, wrong, wrong. A dysplasic lab bred to a poodle with dermatoid cysts does not produce a puppy that is healthy, mutt or otherewise ( so much for hybrid vigor). As for intelligence, once again no mutt is ever going to out do a purebred. Ask any serious hunter, if this were true why would they spend thousands on a well bred hunting dog when they could go to the pound and pick up a pitt bull mix and take it out in the field. Ask the military, if they could get mutts from the pound that would track, protect, and indicate land mines why would they have breeding facilities that produce German Shepherds, Malinois, Labs, and beagles. I would agree you may occassionally find a mutt that can do a comparable job, but not on a reliable basis. This is why people want a purebred.

Next question...where do all the mill dogs go and why do people buy them? This is a good question. I read somewhere that Hunte Corp. ships tens of thousands of puppies a week to pet stores. Its incredible to realize that many people don't read the warnings about buying from a pet store. Or do they? Lets face it, there are warnings everywhere. Every week the newspapers carry stories of puppy mills, Animal Planet's Canine cops show it regularly. Every breed club and Kennel club post warnings and instructions on how to find a reputable breeder. So why do they? I read of a poll that asked that question.
People answered:
1. Spur of the moment decision and they could use a credit card.
2. Breeders ask too many questions and make too many demands.
3. They think they are saving the puppy in the pet shop.
4. Price, or what they imagine the higher cost the reputable breeder will charge.
5. They didn't want a show dog

When I've asked people if they checked the humane league, I always get the same answer: "There is nothing there but Pitt Bulls.

There will always be a demand for the purebred dog, even if the owners can't see a good one from a poor quality one. If its any consolation, its this way in the horse world too, with purebred geldings ( neutered males) often getting the best prices.
caninegroomer
Top Ads