Current Conditions
43°F - CLEAR
Widows sue over losses in crash
Three men died. Driver, who was drunk; parents; two restaurants named.
Sunday News
Jun 14, 2009 00:20 EST
Lancaster
By JEANNETTE SCOTT, Staff Writer
Three widows are trying to forgive Sarah Timblin, the drunken driver who killed their husbands last year. But they aren't letting her, or those who they charge enabled her, off the hook for restitution.
Media Center

Related Topics

Related Stories

Bookmark and Share

Marlin Banks Sr. and brothers Inocente Sanchez and Luis Sanchez were killed when Timblin's SUV struck their Honda Civic head-on early on the morning of March 11, 2008.

Marlayna Banks, Maria Rivero and Lillian Latoni filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Lancaster County Court May 27 against Timblin; her parents, Wayne and Linda Timblin; Doc Holliday's Steakhouse Inc.; Keares Inc., which operated Doc Holliday's, now closed; and Brickyard Sports Inc.

Sarah Timblin, then 23, had gotten on the Route 30 ramp at Harrisburg Pike, near Park City, and was driving the SUV the wrong way in the eastbound lanes. Her blood-alcohol content was 0.26 — more than three times the legal limit for driving.

Timblin, formerly of Washington Boro, is serving a nine-to-18-year sentence in Cambridge Springs state prison.

She was also convicted of DUI in 2006, and public drunkenness in 2006 and 2007.

The lawsuit claims that her parents left their SUV where their daughter worked — the Belvedere Inn Restaurant and Bar — so she could drive home. The lawsuit charges they did so knowing their daughter's license was suspended for the prior DUI charge.

Wayne Timblin refused to comment Thursday.

The lawsuit charges that Doc Holliday's and the Brickyard Restaurant & Sports Pub served Sarah Timblin alcohol though she was visibly intoxicated, and let her leave in that condition.

Pete Keares, president of Keares Inc., said Thursday that he had not been notified of the lawsuit.

"Although we give our condolences," he said, "I think being in the bar four or five hours before the accident and only having a couple of drinks really makes it tough to put any liability on our part."

Timblin was at Doc Holliday's from about 10 to 11 p.m. the night of the crash, Keares said.

"I guess when someone decides to sue somebody, they name anyone they can whether or not they're liable," he said.

According to the lawsuit, Timblin went to the Brickyard after that.

The crash happened at 2:45 a.m March 11.

A call to the Brickyard Thursday was not returned.

In a civil lawsuit, the plaintiff's attorneys must prove negligence, explained attorney David Rosenberg.

In a civil lawsuit, the standard plaintiffs' attorneys must meet to prove negligence is less strict than its criminal equivalent.

Rosenberg, who has an office in Lancaster, is not associated with the lawsuit, and did not comment on it specifically.

In Pennsylvania, a plaintiff cannot ask for a specific amount or reveal to the jury how much insurance money is available to the plaintiffs, Rosenberg said.

Calls to Shawn P. McLaughlin, of Philadelphia, attorney for Rivero, and Neil J. Rovner, of Harrisburg, attorney for Banks, were not returned last week.

"Sarah, I don't hate you. I have to forgive you for what you've done," Banks said at Timblin's sentencing hearing last October. "But I want you to see how many people you've affected."

Inocente Sanchez is survived by his wife, Maria Rivero. Luis Sanchez is survived by his wife, Lillian Latoni, and seven children. Marlin Banks Sr. is survived by his wife and two children.

"If you could just imagine when the working family member dies," Schleifer said. "I don't know how you really calculate that, and it's going to be a tough job for a jury to do someday."



Jeannette Scott is a Sunday News staff writer. Contact her at jscott@lnpnews.com or at 291-8689.

Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 36 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE (grieker @ Jun 15 2009, 11:15 AM)
You can file suit for anything against anyone - that's what is called frivelous.


Actually, it seems as if my body may have been inspired by Talkback and is going on strike and filing suit.....apparently, unfair labor practices. Just got the paperwork today. Led by a lovesick heart it seems internal organs were subject to severe overcrowding, received no pay, little recognition, and worked 24/7 without a break for over five decades. (GI tract experienced "ocassional irregularity", so is seeking reduced reimbursement.)

McDonald's, Ben and Jerry's, and even Talkback were named as co-defendants in contributing to poor conditions. Guess I better "step away from the computer" and get some exercise?!?

But seriously, having worked my way through college as a restaurant manager, it can be extremely difficult even under the best of conditions to control service (one table orders a pitcher of beer, and patron "A" guzzles 4 glasses immediately before leaving, while Patron B drinks responsibly, if at all). This is not to excuse irresponsible bartenders, or Patron B for letting them leave. The best resource is prevention and personal responsibility. I actually am in favor of the new ignition locks, which will prohibit a driver from starting a car if BAC exceeds the legal limit.
WriteofPassage
QUOTE (Maffimuk @ Jun 15 2009, 12:14 PM)
I know it is illegal to serve a visually impaired person (which is how the law reads)


Wow! I never realized it was illegal for a bar to serve me!

We all griped about the seemingly light sentence this individual got. Case of justice finally being carried out in civil court?
thoughts from the east
QUOTE (JTF @ Jun 15 2009, 08:53 PM)
It was after 2am...Doc's was long closed. She actually returned to Iron Hill for the last few drinks and to pick up her car.

I have been following this case - didn't the first articles say that the accidetn happened at 2:40 AM? And didn't she leave the brickyard like 20 minutes after closing? How could she have had time to have a few rounds at either iron hill or DH? Are you just guessing? If not, you should speak up because it would probably be helpful to the bartenders at the brickyard if it comes out that she really went over the limit drinking after hours with friends.
SarahHope
QUOTE (grieker @ Jun 15 2009, 12:15 PM)
You can file suit for anything against anyone - that's what is called frivelous.

I'm still trying to figure out whether your post is serious or a joke! The parents, knowing the daughter had a suspended license, left the car for her to drive home from a bar, they are being sued and you think that it's frivolous. After this lawsuit they can expect another frivolous lawsuit from their auto insurer!!
steelhi82
Can't get blood from a stone, so sue the stone's parents and the bar. Shes' going to jail so you gotta pick somebody with deeper pockets.

Personal responsiblity surrenders, again.

By no means do I think that the families are entitled to nothing. I think financial restitution in some sort is very appropriate, however, I think they're looking in the wrong rabbit hole. They'll most likely win too.
solitary
Top Ads