Current Conditions
40°F - CLEAR
Lampeter-Strasburg board approves drug testing measures
Intelligencer Journal
Jun 16, 2009 00:31 EST
Lampeter
By CINDY HUMMEL, Correspondent

Lampeter-Strasburg High School students in extracurricular activities this fall will be subject to random drug testing.

The L-S school board, in a 6-2 vote Monday night, approved new drug policies for the district, including random drug testing for students in extracurricular activities or who drive to school.

Voting against the measure were Suzanne Keene and Phil Wimer. James Byrnes voted for the policy from Washington, D.C., via a conference call, and board member Jeffrey Mills was absent.

Other new polices include pre-employment drug screening and allowing school nurses to test any student suspected of drug use.

About a dozen parents, students and community members spoke about the random drug testing policy at the meeting.

Parent Mark Combs, who works at a residential treatment facility for at-risk boys, said similar policies tend to create an "in group" and an "out group." Combs said his 11-year-old already is talking about drug testing, while his nearly 16-year-old had no interest in participating in extracurricular activities if the policy passed.

"It is something I am really concerned about," Combs said.

Parent Pat Pontz said she felt the "guilty until proven innocent" nature of random testing hardly seemed fair to students. She also said that being made to urinate in a cup violated students' privacy.

Lisa Horn, the mother of a high school senior, felt the policy would be more fair were the entire student body subject to random testing.

Later in the meeting, a member of the district's drug task force said that state and federal laws prohibit the testing of all students, but that students participating in extracurricular activities can be made to sign papers stipulating they must submit to drug testing if picked.

West Lampeter Township police Chief Jim Walsh said he believes today's students are being encouraged to use drugs, and that he would have wanted his two daughters drug tested if they were in high school today.

"This is the right recommendation," Walsh said, "at the right time."

Parent Bill Benner was among the drug task force members who said they initially were against random drug testing. But what he learned through the task force, he said, changed his mind.

"There is a significant drug problem here at L-S," Benner said.

L-S 2008 alumna and former student board representative Alyssa Henry also supported the measure. She said the policy's success should not be measured in how many students get caught, but in how many lives are saved.

The recommendations for testing were submitted by a 22-member drug task force led by school board member Scott Riekers. The group spent more than a year researching the issue and getting feedback from district residents.

"We have got to get our arms around this problem," Riekers said.


Recent Posts
TalkBack comments about this article
Comment on this article
Take a look inside some of the cars that high school students drive and the searcher will likely find contraband.
taxlady
Later in the meeting, a member of the district's drug task force said that state and federal laws prohibit the testing of all students, but that students participating in extracurricular activities can be made to sign papers stipulating they must submit to drug testing if picked. -LNP-

If picked???
Nope, everyone who is involved in 'extracurricular activities' should be tested!! Not just the ones 'picked'!!
I figure that Johnny & Sally (you know the children who's parents sit on one of the boards or committees) could be intentionally passed over for testing due to the fact that if they were to fail, could or would cause imbarisment to themselves and or the district.

Robotspyder
Hmmm. I don't have a big problem with the fact that the school is testing. I have done all I can to keep my kids from using drugs; however, if I haven't succeeded and my kid gets caught at school, he'll have worse things to worry about than not playing football.

I am concerned, though, about the procedures that will be used and the potential for mishandling or misapplying the policy. The procedure, while it should preclude any opportunity for cheating, should not be humiliating for kids to undergo. And doesn't the "random" idea fly out the window when a kid suspected of using drugs will be tested? And what behavior will be deemed suspicious enough to cause testing, and in whose estimation?
LicenseForMayhem
this new policy simply makes students choose between extracurricular activity at their school and recreational drug use. instead of helping a student demonstrate to himself that the football team is what he wants, he must choose at the gate to entry. hopefully, the district will deploy another genius survey to see how many students opt for drugs over the next year.
salzano
As a parent of 2 teenagers in the L-S District, I have NO problems whatsoever with this policy. I believe i've done all I can to ensure my children are not using illegal drugs, but if for some reason they've been able to deceive me, then I want to know. I realize that for some parents this is raising the proverbial red flag, but as one was quoted as saying earlier, "Drug and alcohol use is stopped in the home by parents who have the guts to be parents and not their childs friend." Now perhaps this is one of those parents who truly believes, as I do, that we have done a good enough job with our own children that we should not need this type of random testing. But perhaps, this is one of those parents who just likes to conveniently think that, all the while they're allowing their 15 year old child to watch rated R movies and play M rated video games because they "just don't see any harm in it". They say "have a good time" to their kids as they go out the door on a friday night with their friends without asking "who are you going out with", "where are you going", or "when will you be home". Who can honestly say that we weren't better off 20-30 years ago, before kids were desensitized to all of the violence thats at their fingertips these days? Before 90+% of all the kids in school carried a cellphone to class and had the ability to text test answers back and forth? Back when kids would be turned in if it was found out that they had brought drugs to school, or were selling drugs to other students, or simply caught using drugs. Back when their parents WOULDN'T threaten a lawsuit upon finding out that their child was turned in for such behavior, but rather they'd ask "what did you do" and punish their child worse than the school district would, or could.
I feel it truly is a shame that we've come to this point. I didn't want to see the school board have to create this proposal, but as our elected officials representing the will of the district, I trust they believe this has become a big enough problem that something drastic had to be done. Therefore at this point, barring an all out vote within the district that all residents could've participated in, i'm left to believe the right decision has been made and I support it. To those parents that do not, I believe you had/have every right to run for election on the school board. Please feel free to take advantage of that democratic right in the future if you feel so strongly about the unjustification of this, or any other proposal. I know i've considered it, just as i've usually kept my opinions to myself.
ARealist
Top Ads