Current Conditions
43°F - CLEAR
Pitts lone Pa. vote against unemployment extension
Sunday News
Oct 04, 2009 00:13 EST
By JEANNETTE SCOTT, Staff Writer

Charles Bullitt, 48, of Lancaster, received what he thought was his final unemployment check Monday, marking the end of a seven-week extension of benefits. He has been unemployed since March 2008, when he lost his job preparing taxes in York.

"It's a nerve-racking time, but the good thing about it is there's a lot of support in Lancaster with community services that help me out," said Bullitt at CareerLink of Lancaster County, where he was taking skills tests for a potential employer Friday.

Recent legislation bought more time for Bullitt and others who are out of work. On Sept. 22, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 331-83 to extend unemployment benefits by 13 weeks in the 27 states with unemployment rates of at least 8.5 percent.

Pennsylvania is one of those states. Republican U.S. Rep. Joe Pitts (16th District) was the only Pennsylvania congressman to vote against it.

In an e-mail statement Thursday, Pitts said the extension "also extends a federal government surtax on all businesses through 2010. If we want to create jobs, the worst thing to do in a poor economy is to raise taxes."

Employers pay a 6.2 percent tax on employee wages. That rate was scheduled to drop by .2 percent in January. The recent legislation delays that decrease until 2011.

Only a few constituents called Pitts' office to urge him to vote for the unemployment extension bill, according to Andrew Wimer, his press secretary. Just one displeased person called after the vote, said Wimer.

The congressman's political opponent in 2010, Democrat Lois Herr, blasted his vote. "The people are hurting so badly in this economy and I would have voted to extend it," she said. "People are out of work longer than expected, and they need it."

Pitts' district includes Lancaster County, along with portions of Chester and Berks counties. Lancaster County's unemployment rate reached 7.6 percent in August, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry, its highest level in 26 years. Still, that was tied for fourth-lowest in the state.

It's even lower in Chester County, where the unemployment rate rose from 6.5 percent in July to 6.6 percent in August. Berks County's unemployment rate is significantly higher, at 9.3 percent in August, up from 9.2 percent in July.

The state unemployment rate rose one-tenth of a point to 8.6 percent in August — the highest in almost 25 years.

Statistics show Lancaster County has an estimated 20,300 people without work, 8,300 more than a year earlier.

Manufacturing jobs here now total 37,700, the fewest since since 1990.

Construction, retail, leisure and hospitality, business and professional services have all seen a decrease in the number of local jobs. One of the few sectors to grow was education and health services, which added 1,300 jobs, according to the state Department of Labor & Industry.

Nationally, the unemployment rate reached 9.8 percent in September, and employers slashed another 263,000 jobs, according to a report by the U.S. Department of Labor released Friday. Job-seekers now outnumber openings 6 to 1.

Bullitt has a lot of company.

He went on yet another job interview last week and tries to keep his hopes up. But news of the latest unemployment benefits extension gave him a boost.

"That'd be awesome!" he said. "That's a godsend. My landlord will be happy."



Jeannette Scott is a Sunday News staff writer. Contact her at jscott@lnpnews.com or at 291-8689.


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 21 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
Thanks Joe. The continuous extension of unemployment benefits is morphing into a defacto new form of welfare.

Pennsylvania should not be adding the cost of unemployment benefits of non-workers onto the backs of workers and employers who are still fortunate and remain open for business. Keep it up, and there will not be any more businesses left to employ anybody (except gov't - the employer of last resort).
ReaganRepublican
QUOTE (ReaganRepublican @ Oct 6 2009, 01:19 AM)
Thanks Joe. The continuous extension of unemployment benefits is morphing into a defacto new form of welfare


so what happened to the trickle down?

is it going to take long?

QUOTE (PIMom @ Oct 4 2009, 07:48 PM)
there are STILL more jobs available in Lancaster County than there are people who want to work.


please feel free to back that up with something more than...

anger...
mnepats52
QUOTE (ReaganRepublican @ Oct 6 2009, 12:19 AM)
Thanks Joe. The continuous extension of unemployment benefits is morphing into a defacto new form of welfare.

Pennsylvania should not be adding the cost of unemployment benefits of non-workers onto the backs of workers and employers who are still fortunate and remain open for business. Keep it up, and there will not be any more businesses left to employ anybody (except gov't - the employer of last resort).

So what does it cost Pennsylvanians when someone looses their home in foreclosure? What would it cost you in property value if the bank foreclosed on your neighbor? What does is cost PA when someone is forced onto welfare because their unemployment lapsed and they can't find work? When a family is forced to move out of state to find work and never returns?

This survival-of-the-fittest perspective looks different from the top of the food chain. However, we all know that one catastophy can radically change the circumstances--anyone's circumstances.
wrsny337
QUOTE (wrsny337 @ Oct 6 2009, 08:36 AM)
So what does it cost Pennsylvanians when someone looses their home in foreclosure? What would it cost you in property value if the bank foreclosed on your neighbor? What does is cost PA when someone is forced onto welfare because their unemployment lapsed and they can't find work? When a family is forced to move out of state to find work and never returns?

When jobs leave a state and region due to competitive pressures, it's various forms of welfare that fill in the vacuum to feed the masses. Asking citizens to pay for their neighbor's home mortgages so that they can stay in an area where employment possibilities are slim to non-existant is pure socialism.

The question you need to ask is why is our state less competitive? Why do businesses and young professionals leave our state for better business climates? Why do Pennsylvanian residents pay among the highest home, business, and auto insurance rates? Why do we pay among the highest workmen's comp, unemployment, and school tax rates? It's no secret that we pay high cable television rates, gasoline prices, etc., in comparison to other regions of our nation.

The answer is our voters have allowed our lawmakers to sell us out. Our children's futures and the long term viability of an economically healthy and vibrant business climate have been traded for the selfish short-term personal gains of our elected political class.
QUOTE (wrsny337 @ Oct 6 2009, 08:36 AM)
This survival-of-the-fittest perspective looks different from the top of the food chain. However, we all know that one catastophy can radically change the circumstances--anyone's circumstances.

I'm all for the ultimate "safety net" of keeping people from starving in the streets. Collectively paying for everybodys' mortgages and lifestyles for those making the decision to remain in an area that offers no decent job possibilities outside of gov't employment is a recipe for economic disaster for those who need to work for a living to pay for it all .....
ReaganRepublican
QUOTE (ReaganRepublican @ Oct 6 2009, 10:11 AM)
When jobs leave a state and region due to competitive pressures, it's various forms of welfare that fill in the vacuum to feed the masses. Asking citizens to pay for their neighbor's home mortgages so that they can stay in an area where employment possibilities are slim to non-existant is pure socialism.

The question you need to ask is why is our state less competitive? Why do businesses and young professionals leave our state for better business climates? Why do Pennsylvanian residents pay among the highest home, business, and auto insurance rates? Why do we pay among the highest workmen's comp, unemployment, and school tax rates? It's no secret that we pay high cable television rates, gasoline prices, etc., in comparison to other regions of our nation.

The answer is our voters have allowed our lawmakers to sell us out. Our children's futures and the long term viability of an economically healthy and vibrant business climate have been traded for the selfish short-term personal gains of our elected political class.

I hear what your saying, RR. Seems like people tend to get too focused on national politics and forget about (or take lightly) state and local politics. You make a good point. Thanks.

QUOTE (ReaganRepublican @ Oct 6 2009, 10:11 AM)
I'm all for the ultimate "safety net" of keeping people from starving in the streets. Collectively paying for everybodys' mortgages and lifestyles for those making the decision to remain in an area that offers no decent job possibilities outside of gov't employment is a recipe for economic disaster for those who need to work for a living to pay for it all .....

Another good point. Balance and common sense are key. All I'm saying: Our neighbor's problems (or lack in addressing them) eventually affect all of us.
wrsny337
Top Ads