Current Conditions
54°F - P/SUNNY
'Getting something done'
Mayor hits road in re-election bid
Sunday News
Oct 11, 2009 00:21 EST
Lancaster
By GIL SMART, Associate Editor

Media Center

Related Topics

Related Stories

Bookmark and Share
Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray stopped his Toyota Prius at Shippen and Chester streets to talk to a man working in the corner yard. Gray knows the guy, he explained; there was some trouble with a neighbor and Gray intervened on the man's behalf with city police.

"How's it going?" asked the mayor. The reply: "It's getting better."

The same, Gray suggests, might be said of the city itself.

Gray, a Democrat, is running for re-election this fall against former Mayor Charlie Smithgall, the Republican Gray defeated last time around, in 2005. Then Gray was the challenger, attacking the two-term mayor for lacking vision; Gray promised to improve the city's neighborhoods and boost economic development.

These days it's Smithgall slamming Gray — for losing the city's police contract with Lancaster Township, for streetscape improvements that have dragged on, for not "applying common sense in government."

Gray said all Smithgall does is criticize: "He reminds me of the little old men on 'The Muppet Show' who used to sit up in the balcony and complain," he said.

Sure, Gray admits, there have been missteps. But he said those are far outnumbered by success stories. And he'd like a chance to get even more done.

Contrasting images
The differences between the two candidates, the two men, is profound. Smithgall, a druggist by trade, is big and casual and affable. He drives a huge Chevrolet Suburban and prides himself on his nuts-and-bolts knowledge of the city. Gray, a former defense attorney, is natty in his bow ties, gets 60 mpg in his hybrid and lives along Gallery Row, befitting a man married to an artist.

If Smithgall's a guy from the neighborhood, Gray's more of a technocrat. Smithgall, Gray said, spends his time looking down — seeing things like gum on the sidewalk, and making an issue of it.

Gray, by contrast, prefers to look up. And when he does he sees a city thriving, the envy of other Pennsylvania mayors.

"We spend so much time grousing about how this isn't right or that isn't right, we forget what is right," Gray said, noting a man and woman standing on the market side of Penn Square, taking photos of the monument and the Marriott hotel behind it. "There's a lot going on in the city."

At the center
On a ride through town, Gray cited a list of "success stories," projects that began or have been completed during his time in office.

The list is long and begins, as it must, on Penn Square.

Downtown retailers, he said, are beginning to see the impact of the new hotel and convention center. But he also worries that the 19-story tower is so prominent that it overshadows other positive things that are going on downtown and — equally as important — in the neighborhoods.

Gray rolled past Lancaster Square, where underused and unsightly concrete was demolished to clear a site now awaiting a developer. "The problem is, it's too small," Gray said. "But we're finally getting something done."

Half a block north, the old parking lot at the corner of North Queen and East Chestnut streets has been torn up to make way for an expanded Red Rose Transit Authority bus station, a 395-space parking garage, an expanded Lancaster Museum of Art and a 38-unit condominium tower that could rise to 16 stories.

The North Museum is also studying the feasibility of building a new science and education center just across the street, on the western corner of the intersection.

The 300 block of North Queen Street, one of the artsiest spots in the city, continues to thrive, Gray said, with several new shops opening in recent years.

Continuing north, Gray's Prius rolled past the Amtrak station, where ground was finally broken last summer on an $8.5 million renovation project that will revitalize one of the city's underappreciated architectural gems. Gray made his way to the old Lancaster Stockyards site, now leveled as plans to construct a new office park proceed, and he stopped.

The site, he noted, had been a major eyesore. "You had people who were obviously living in here," he said. Mosquitoes with West Nile virus bred in the rubble. So last summer Gray threatened to raze the site: "I said [to the owners] you either tear it down or we will," he said. The city, owners and the New York developers who had an option on the site reached an agreement a few months later.

Meanwhile, Gray said, he resisted efforts to redevelop the site with a Walmart or Target store; big-box retail, he said, wasn't what the city needed. Good-paying jobs were. And he said his persistence paid off: When TCH Development produced plans for a business park — in which at least one tenant will employ "green" technology, such as solar roof panels — "we said, 'That's a home run, that's exactly what we wanted,' " Gray said.

Smaller successes
Still, he said, while big issues like the Stockyards make headlines, he takes as much satisfaction from smaller, less-obvious initiatives that save tax dollars through greater efficiency, and make the city a better place to live.

He's particularly proud of the way the city has cracked down on problem landlords. "We've prosecuted and prosecuted," he said, noting that there had been a law on the books requiring "systematic inspections" of all rental properties in the city. Yet prior to his time in office, he said, the city had no record of how many rental units there actually were in town.

The same problem cropped up when the city, under Gray, went to a single trash hauler. "We didn't know how many customers there were," he said. Now every rental unit and every trash customer is registered, he said. Gray thinks that's made neighborhoods better, cleaner places to live.

Gray's also made a major commitment to improve city parks. At Sixth Ward Park, for example, Gray talked of how the basketball court will be moved and the wading pool fixed so kids can use it again. "We have initiatives in place for all our parks, to make them more usable than they are now," he said.

On a ride down South Plum Street, past "The Porches at Plum," a new 11-home development constructed by SACA Development Corp.'s Lancaster Homeownership Choice Program, Gray noted nearby homes that have been painted, yards weeded. "You fix up a place in a neighborhood and people can actually change their behavior pattern," Gray said. "You see people doing this all around the city."

Another thing you see all over the city are signs for Gray's opponent.

Gray said his own campaign had run out of signs and had to order more, but in many areas Smithgall signs outnumber Gray's two to one, at least.

Gray would rather talk about his accomplishments than his opponent. But he clearly gets annoyed when the subject of Smithgall's criticism of the "bulb-outs" at city intersections comes up.

"That was his screw-up and we had to fix it," Gray said, noting that the city was sued in 2005 because its curbs and sidewalks didn't comply with Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. "We had experts come out and tell us what is and isn't compliant; it wasn't our choice.

"If he's got a problem with it, he should go look in the mirror," Gray said.

And Gray said that while Smithgall boasts about how he's always accessible, "he's not accessible when you want to debate him."

"He can run but he can't hide," Gray said.

Smithgall responded that he'll face Gray Thursday night, when both candidates appear at a question-and-answer session at Ray's Temple Community Church of God in Christ, at South Ann Street and East End Avenue. The event, which beging at 7 p.m. and is free to the public, will feature four clergy members from the area and two community members asking questions of the two candidates; neither candidate will be permitted to question the other.

"I'm interested in taking questions from the general public," Smithgall said, noting that a back-and-forth with Gray doesn't necessarily answer the real questions city residents might have.

As for Gray's assertion that he does nothing but criticize, Smithgall said "that will change this week. I'm laying out my own plan.

"I wanted to lay out what was wrong before I started talking about what could be right," Smithgall said.

"He's blowing his own horn," Smithgall said, "but you gotta watch what he's blowing — a lot of the stuff he's taking credit for, we started."

Policing the city
Crime could loom large in the election, but Gray said that statistically, "it's about flat." Type 2 crimes — vandalism, assault, drug offenses, prostitution — are up, he conceded. "But one of the reasons is enforcement," he said. "When you enforce quality-of-life crimes" arrest rates go up, but it doesn't necessarily mean that more crimes are being committed.

On one of the hottest topics in recent weeks — the loss of the police contract with Lancaster Township — Gray held his ground, continuing to insist that the city is better off without the added burden of policing the township.

Moreover, he noted a newspaper article last week about a proposed new contract between Mountville Borough and Manor Township Police Department, which patrols Mountville, that would cost $107 per resident. That's actually more than the $102 per resident the city contract would have cost Lancaster Township.

If re-elected, Gray wants the city he leads to resemble the car he drives. "I want to see a 'greener' city," he said. "We've done energy audits" of city buildings, he said; he'd like to see more.

The city could use federal stimulus funds to buy and rehabilitate condemned buildings, he said. Other goals include funding and completing streetscape improvements around town and completing development of the Sunnyside peninsula.

Gray, on the board of directors of the Pennsylvania League of Cities, has been campaigning door to door in recent weeks. And while he hears the inevitable complaints, he said that "generally, [people are] pretty positive. They talk about how good things are" in Lancaster.

And he thinks he's got the organization to turn out voters on Election Day, which could tip the contest.

His opponent "wants to be mayor, but he doesn't want to do mayor," Gray said. "We think good things are happening in the city. And we want to keep it going."

 



Gil Smart is associate editor of the Sunday News. E-mail him at gsmart@lnpnews.com, or phone 291-8817.

 


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 55 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE (a guest @ Oct 12 2009, 01:49 PM)
Well, If seeing two of my friends get screwed by Charlie makes me silly and angry..So be it.

Glenn summed it up best though.

And the 17 million that Charlie spent on the city police station did not hinder the city at all right??

How many new pieces of fire apparatus did the city fire department get under Charlie??? ZERO

How many did they get under Rick Gray??? TWO...

Hmmm... and Charlie says he wants to increase public safety...


Guest, is the public safety limited to the fire fighters?

The crime rate has risen significantly in the last 4 years, but maybe that's not under the same category as "public safety"? Maybe spend the money on more officers and not on bulb outs, studies for an unneeded trolley, or the $60k in lights to decorate a parking garage? Call me old fashioned but I'd rather have more police than multi-million dollar trolley. Furthermore, the money spent on the new Police station was needed, the old station was falling apart and out-dated; I toured that facility (on my own accord, not as a "guest"), it needed replaced.

As for the TWO new fire apparatuses, that's great, but ONE is rated too heavy for what the city streets can accommodate and sits idle too often because it requires a CDL-trained operator (from what I understand). The apparatus is a beautiful piece of machinery, but if it can't get around the city, it's not very much help to the public.

Glenn is reasonable and does make valid points, sorry to hear about your friends.
Pineapple
QUOTE (Pineapple @ Oct 12 2009, 10:44 PM)
Guest, is the public safety limited to the fire fighters?

The crime rate has risen significantly in the last 4 years, but maybe that's not under the same category as "public safety"? Maybe spend the money on more officers and not on bulb outs, studies for an unneeded trolley, or the $60k in lights to decorate a parking garage? Call me old fashioned but I'd rather have more police than multi-million dollar trolley. Furthermore, the money spent on the new Police station was needed, the old station was falling apart and out-dated; I toured that facility (on my own accord, not as a "guest"), it needed replaced.

As for the TWO new fire apparatuses, that's great, but ONE is rated too heavy for what the city streets can accommodate and sits idle too often because it requires a CDL-trained operator (from what I understand). The apparatus is a beautiful piece of machinery, but if it can't get around the city, it's not very much help to the public.

Glenn is reasonable and does make valid points, sorry to hear about your friends.


So once again history repeats it self as the FD gets nothing??

While the boys in blue do a great job in the city, I'd rather see the FD get more manpower to their ranks and not be treated as the bastard stepchild as they were under Charlie.

From what I have read, the bulb outs were something that Rick Gray had to fix because Charlie did not do it right the first time(If I am wrong, someone please correct me)

I'll agree with what Chief Usdin said, I personally do not see a need for a trolley in the city. The current mayor definatley seems to be the lesser of the two evils.

Two of the guys that were laid off are friends of mine, so as Chief Usdin Said, I'll happilly be silly and angry.
Woody Woodward
QUOTE (Artie See @ Oct 12 2009, 10:06 PM)
I STRONGLY disagree with that statement. Smithgall did a LOT of lasting damage to Lancaster City. I don't have the time to argue the point right now, but there can be no doubt that the negatives of Smithgall's tenure as mayor clearly outweighed the positives.


Artie, I'd have to STRONGLY disagree with you. As a longtime city resident and business owner, the positives from Charlie do out weigh the bad. He's not and was not perfect, but if you really believe that he did more harm then good, I do disagree. I can't say I agree or agreed with everything he did or how he did it, but he did start and finish things, people who don't see that, are (in my opinion) clouded in their judgment. And Charlie had a positive economic influence on the city, he took over the city with huge debt, and handed one over with a large surplus of cash; and his projects are still producing revenue for Mr. Gray. Not to mention one of the best ratings in the state against crime.
Pineapple
QUOTE (Woody Woodward @ Oct 12 2009, 11:18 PM)
So once again history repeats it self as the FD gets nothing??

While the boys in blue do a great job in the city, I'd rather see the FD get more manpower to their ranks and not be treated as the bastard stepchild as they were under Charlie.

From what I have read, the bulb outs were something that Rick Gray had to fix because Charlie did not do it right the first time(If I am wrong, someone please correct me)

I'll agree with what Chief Usdin said, I personally do not see a need for a trolley in the city. The current mayor definatley seems to be the lesser of the two evils.

Two of the guys that were laid off are friends of mine, so as Chief Usdin Said, I'll happilly be silly and angry.


Woody as I wrote earlier to Glenn, if the men relieved out of spite, that's wrong. No defense in that, none at all. As for the FD being treated like the stepchild, that's not right either, but in the case of the crimes and the undermanned police, it's a catch 22, bottom line is the city needs more of both.

As for the bulb-outs, 1 guy points at the other and vice versa, if they have to be installed, at least do them right. Recently I had an engineer tell me 50% or more are not up to code. Even in areas where the bulb-out exist, I see people in wheel-chairs rolling down the middle of the street and not using the sidewalks, I see it almost every day.
Pineapple
QUOTE (Pineapple @ Oct 12 2009, 08:44 PM)
Guest, is the public safety limited to the fire fighters?

The crime rate has risen significantly in the last 4 years, but maybe that's not under the same category as "public safety"?

As for the TWO new fire apparatuses, that's great, but ONE is rated too heavy for what the city streets can accommodate and sits idle too often because it requires a CDL-trained operator (from what I understand). The apparatus is a beautiful piece of machinery, but if it can't get around the city, it's not very much help to the public.


Big issue with public safety.

Spending money on police is politically correct. EVERYONE is worried about crime. All the time. The crime rate can never be low enough. So spending money on cops is always welcomed. People are always talking about crime and how much needs to be spent on fighting it.

Spending money on fire is wasted politically. Nobody ever goes to sleep and worries that their house/business is going to burn up. There are never enough fires to make people worry about them. It's sad to say, but until your house is on fire, you really don't think much about the fire department. Nobody ever calls city hall and tells them to pay those firefighters more money.

Cops, out there preventing crime.

Firefighters, well who knows what they do when they are not fighting fires. But when there is a fire, wow, people can't say enough about the brave men and women. Until the fire is out and its quiet for a few weeks.

You see the picture...its easy to spend money of police stuff. Its politically braver to spend it on fire stuff. Nobody is going to hand you votes for doing that.

But it is as right and important as supporting the cops.

Public safety is both fire and police. The cornerstone of municipal government.

Now about the "big" fire trucks.

All fire trucks in the United States are EXEMPT by Federal regulations from CDL rules. There are no requirements for a CDL operator to be used on a new ladder piece or any other firetruck.

Fire trucks are getting bigger and heavier. The city is not getting any bigger. So there are many streets in Lancaster that are not great for firetrucks. ANY firetruck. This has been an issue since the 60's. It won't get any better. FYI, the Federal government has enacted many of the regulations that make the trucks bigger, and the NFPA ( anon governmental standards making group) has enacted others, that all make the newest versions of fire trucks bigger, heavier and more costly.

There are no trucks in the city fire fleet that are rated too heavy to be used on streets. Your average loaded garbage truck weighs more than most fire trucks. And every day, there are hundreds of agricultural and fuel tractor trailers going through the city that weigh far more than the citys big ladder truck.

My problem with what you "understand" is that whomever told you those things about the new fire truck was dead wrong.

If I am wrong about this, I am sure one of the city firefighters will correct me in short order.
glennusdin
Top Ads