Current Conditions
43°F - CLEAR
County job cuts coming
Government has $1.2 million shortfall in the 2010 budget.
Sunday News
Nov 01, 2009 00:22 EST
Lancaster
By JON RUTTER, Staff Writer

Media Center

Related Topics

Related Stories

Bookmark and Share
The specter of layoffs is hanging over Lancaster County government.

Department heads were told during their monthly leadership meeting last week to advise their staffs about possible personnel cuts before the end of the year.

"I think we're all kind of braced for that possibility," said Leslie Hyson, executive director of the county's Human Relations Commission.

Commissioner Craig Lehman confirmed that the county might consolidate or eliminate some positions to help make up a projected $1.2 million shortfall in the 2010 budget. He also said he expects some of the savings to come from cuts unrelated to personnel.

"I would be reluctant to put a time frame" on the process, Lehman added.

And, asked whether across-the-board cuts are in store, he said no.

Speculation about what departments or positions might be impacted by layoffs is just that until efficiency studies are completed later this month, said Lehman, Commissioner Scott Martin and board Chairman Dennis P. Stuckey.

All departments had been asked to review staffing levels and services — some examinations were conducted in-house, while others were done by consultants. A study of the Human Resources Department is due Monday.

A McCullough Consulting Group study of whether to fold some, or all, of the Department of Parks and Recreation into the county's new Facilities Management Department was due last week.

"I think they're in the process of submitting it," said Lehman, who added that a public session to go over the results will be held sometime in the next few weeks.

James Hackett, county parks director, said he had no idea who might be eliminated from the employment rolls.

Dory Crater, who heads the county's Records Management Department, referred questions about layoffs to the commissioners. "They're the ones making those determinations," she said.

County Administrator Charles Douts Jr. briefed the department heads on the budget situation last week, Martin said. Douts did not return a call to his office Friday.

Martin said another reason the commissioners have held off announcing layoffs outright is that other budget "wild cards" are still out there. The county does not know yet how much state funding it will get for its drug and alcohol program, for example, he said.

"We don't want to create any alarmism" for county employees, Martin added. But, in this tight economy, "you don't want to be passing along costs" to struggling taxpayers.

The county usually adopts its budget for the following year in the third week of December. "By law," Martin said, "we have to pass a balanced budget."

The commissioners, who approved an updated severance policy during a work session last Tuesday, have scheduled a public meeting to discuss the budget at 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 1, at 150 N. Queen St.

The county employs about 1,600 people full time and 300 part time, according to its Web site.

Several county employees, speaking on condition on anonymity, said they were worried about their jobs.

It was unclear last week how many employees had been informed of the situation by their supervisors.

"I've only heard rumors," one worker noted.

Said another, "There may be other departments that must make tough decisions. ... Maybe we got lucky, but I think we are already doing more with less."

 



Jon Rutter is a staff writer for the Sunday News. His e-mail address is jrutter@lnpnews.com.

 

 


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 17 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE (Artie See @ Nov 1 2009, 06:09 PM)
I would tend to agree with you. However, as Rick Gray has proven, there are ways to cut administrative positions out of government without jeopardizing public services.

I believe that government must be operated as efficiently as possible. There isn't much fat left in the City government, if any at all, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the ever-increasing size of the County government could be trimmed a bit.

Yes, I know I am a political anomaly: a Democrat who is also a fiscal conservative.


I am the kind of guy who thinks if you hire someone they should keep their job until they quit or get fired. I would rather see a long term commitment to reducing the number of personnel by cutting positions after they retire, etc. I hate to see people lose their jobs because the Commissioners of yesteryear took on too many projects with no plans to pay for them.

I would like to see consolidation and training for other positions in the departments to make employees more valuable.
SWWeiss
QUOTE (tkrause66 @ Nov 1 2009, 10:42 PM)
Start with the least productive... i.e. the folks who stand outside half the day smoking cigarettes!!

I agree. People who smoke waste time.
taxlady
Interesting how some people are quick to comment of the ever-expanding Lancaster County government. Let's compare 2008 capital cost with our PA neighbors: Lancaster County - $575/person; Berks County - $1,198/person Chester County - $1,139/person; York County - $909/ person. If Lancaster has fat, it's mild compared to our neighbors. A little research goes along way.

Link

http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cac...aIw-ySmpgAa4ZTA
Domes
I agree. People who smoke waste time.

And they waste tobacco by smoking it.... Yuck... It should be chewed instead.
Maffimuk
QUOTE (Domes @ Nov 1 2009, 10:32 PM)
If Lancaster has fat, it's mild compared to our neighbors.

That would be good news. Thank you very much.
Artie See
Top Ads