Current Conditions
55°F - SUNNY
Gray re-elected; Democrats sweep City Council
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era
Nov 04, 2009 01:49 EST
Lancaster
By BERNARD HARRIS, Staff Writer

Media Center

Related Topics

Related Stories

Bookmark and Share
Lancaster city voters by a narrow margin Tuesday returned Democrat Rick Gray to City Hall for four more years and voted to retain an all-Democratic City Council.

It was the second consecutive sweep by city Democrats in a mayoral election.

Gray, who is completing his first four-year term, defeated former Republican Mayor Charlie Smithgall with 52 percent of the vote.

The results, with all precincts reporting, are:

Rick Gray — 3787
Charlie Smithgall — 3474

Gray claimed victory before a crowd of supporters at his campaign headquarters less than two hours after polls closed.

Gray said the positive campaign waged by himself and City Council candidates Louise Williams, Jose Urdaneta, Tim Roschel and Todd Smith resonated with voters.

"Negative campaigning may have an impact, but it doesn't work. … If you run down the city that you want to govern, it's not going to work," said Gray, who faulted Smithgall for a campaign message that crime is rampant in the city.

Smithgall conceded the race, but rejected Gray's claims that it was a mandate of his administration.

"Out of a 13,000-plus voter deficit and to only lose by 300 votes is really an amazing thing," Smithgall said, referring to the Democratic voter-registration edge in the city.

"I think it sends a message that the city is not happy with the way things are going. It's not a mandate at all," Smithgall said of the results.

The only other citywide Republican candidate was Matt Holden, who ran unsuccessfully for City Council.

Holden ran against a full slate of Democrats, three of whom are incumbents. Williams, Urdaneta and Roschel were all elected to a second term.

With all city precincts reporting, the results in the City Council voting are:

Louise B. Williams — 4255
Jose Urdaneta — 4036
Tim Roschel — 4007
Todd E. Smith — 3851
Matthew Holden — 3303

Williams said she believes voters came out to reward the Democrats for initiatives such as establishing single-hauler residential trash service and tougher regulation of landlords and problem tenants.

"I think the people believed in what we are doing and have done in the city," Williams said. "I believe people think we have been trying to do what is best for the city."

Holden Tuesday night thanked his supporters for their hard work and claimed a limited victory in doing as well as he did.

"It was a very difficult race. We knew that from the beginning," he said, adding that he believed having a slate of fellow Republican candidates would have helped him.

Lancaster City Democratic Chairman John Graupera said many factors went into the Democrats' win.

"It always starts with good candidates and a dedicated campaign staff and top-notch volunteers. If you've got all that, then you get the results that you see here tonight," Graupera said shortly before Gray made his victory speech.

Roschel, particularly, credited the Democrats' get-out-the-vote efforts.

Those efforts began with volunteers staffing phone banks two weeks before the election. They made calls every weekday evening, ultimately calling 5,000 likely voters, said Jerome Hodos, the party's volunteer coordinator.

Hodos said volunteers attempted to call all 5,000 of those voters again Tuesday to urge them to go to the polls.

Between 150 and 200 party volunteers made calls and distributed literature for the candidates from Saturday until Tuesday. On Tuesday alone, there were 130 to 140 volunteers outside the polls and knocking on doors, and four people driving voters to the polls.

Graupera said the party was hoping to equal the 25-percent turnout from the last mayoral election four years ago. This time, only 19 percent of the city's 38,150 registered voters went to the polls.

In March, when no Republican had come forward by the primary election filing deadline, Gray said he would run the same campaign regardless of whether he had a challenger.

"We had to answer some of the attacks, that was different," Gray said, adding that other than that, "we did pretty much the same thing we started out to do."

Smithgall only became a candidate following the May primary. During that election, more than 130 voters cast write-in ballots with his name, in a campaign that Smithgall said he did not orchestrate. In late June, Smithgall announced that he would accept the nomination.

Late Tuesday, he urged his supporters not to give up. He urged them to attend City Council meetings and challenge Gray not to cut city police positions or pursue unnecessary spending.

And he rejected the Democrats' claims that that his campaign was negative.

"People had to be awoken as to what is going on in the city and that was the way to do it," Smithgall said. "The city is in trouble and people had to know it."

bharris@lnpnews.com


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 73 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE (Kate @ Nov 4 2009, 09:17 PM)
Mayor Gray makes about $77K per year. Two of his department directors make more than he does.

It's time for this administration to seriously consider cutting back the high price salaries and trimming where they can. Does the mayor seriously need an "aide" as in Pat Brogan? His secretary could do what Pat does.


Pat Brogan isn't just a lackey, she is a policy writer and hatchet-person for Gray.
avgwhiteguy
QUOTE (avgwhiteguy @ Nov 4 2009, 09:52 PM)
Pat Brogan isn't just a lackey, she is a policy writer and hatchet-person for Gray.


Oh, she is far more than that. She is the Democrat party's Chief Spook, for a very long time. Keeper of skeletons-in-closets, writer of dirty political playbooks, propagandist extraordinaire and probably the last person you would want to cross in Lancaster's political landscape. She's also Rick's keeper, to a large degree. And in her free time she makes sure everyone who works in the administration stays in lock-step with The Party's realpolitik.

QUOTE (city liver)
oh, and Charlotte is quiet busy! You ever been a Mayor of a City? I think not.


I believe you're referring to Charlotte Katzenmoyer. She's the city's Director of Economic Development and Neighborhood Revitalization, not Rick Gray's secretary. That would be Bernice, who Rick brought with him from his law practice. Bernice is the one who answers the phone, if you try calling often enough.
citydweller
QUOTE (scumchaser @ Nov 4 2009, 05:58 PM)
Tougher on problem tenants? Oh, how hard can one laugh?

Let's see, who's happy Gray is re-elected:

1.Problem tenants ( who are a majority of the residents of the city and who have more rights than the minority of actual HOMEOWNERS).

SLUMLORDS are the problem, real landlords are not. When a slumlord can collect Section 8 rents every month like clockwork, put the money in his or her pocket, never visit the property or do anytihng to fix it up, it's FREE CASH and the government pays it. HUD needs to put a stop to the free money giveaway and slum lords have to be held responsible., Yet, you have bleeding heart defense attorneys like Grey who fight for the rights of the slum lord and tie things up in court just so the slum lord does not have to be held accountable.

Next, EVICT the slum tenants PERMANENTLY who play the system for welfare, Section 8, live on food stamps, pretend they cant get a job, claim SSI and SSD because they're lazy and dont want to work, have additional illegit kids so they can get more money, overburden the school system by paying ZERO taxes and having 8 kids they cant afford. REQUIRE MANATORY DRUG TESTING FOR SECTION 8 and any government benefit!!

There are slum landlords and slum tenants. Until BOTH are driven out of town, Lancaster will remain a losing battle.

YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD MY FRIEND.... TO BAD EVERY ONE WHO IS POWER TO DO SOMETHING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE CAN"T DO THE RIGHT THING AND MAKE IT DIFFERENT!.
Bober40
QUOTE (litlmo @ Nov 4 2009, 08:35 PM)
I have a question for Tb. This is mainly to educate myself, and to understand these opinions. My question is this: How much money does the mayor make? I cant imagine that is was more than he was making being a defense lawyers for criminals. Questions two: Why would anybody in their right mind give up that much money to become a mayor if he wasnt passionate about Lancaster and its many challenges? I'm not looking for any smart a** answers, I'm very serious. Taking on a position like this(that i'm sure doesnt pay alot) means that this man is on call 24/7. Calls to him home while eating dinner, ppl bitching 24/7 etc. I do not know this man, I have heard stories about him being a great lawyer if you dont want to go to prison. I just wanna kno who would want all the bs that comes with this position if he didnt care. My opinion just on these facts, are he must care about the city, or someone is loading his pockets. I would love to hear your feedback.


I'm sure he loves the city... and I'm sure he made more money in his law practice.. which I think he's still getting a piece of...? But he never had the power in the city that he has now.... Power is what most politicians are after... Rick has another 4 to show us what he is made of....It seems 8 is the magic number in Lancaster.. so lets see how it goes....???
toobad
QUOTE (citydweller @ Nov 4 2009, 10:12 PM)
I believe you're referring to Charlotte Katzenmoyer. She's the city's Director of Economic Development and Neighborhood Revitalization, not Rick Gray's secretary.

Randy Patterson is the city's Director of Economic Development and Neighborhood Revitalization. Charlotte Katzenmoyer is Director of Public Works.
Artie See
Top Ads