Current Conditions
28°F - SNOW
Five county farmers face lawsuits
Claim manure runoff hitting Solanco streams
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era
Nov 19, 2009 00:01 EST
By AD CRABLE, Staff Writer

Saying "clean water must start here," a state environmental group is threatening to sue five small southern Lancaster County farmers over alleged manure and soil runoff into local streams and the Chesapeake Bay.

"Farming doesn't give anyone a license to pollute, and there are plenty of resources to help farmers adopt techniques to avoid having livestock manure enter our waters," said Kimberly Snell-Zarcone, an attorney with Harrisburg-based Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future.

Snell-Zarcone and PennFuture have given four dairy farmers and a poultry farmer 60 days to take steps to get livestock and manure off of bare ground, or face lawsuits to be filed in Lancaster County Court.

The legal action would be based on violations of the state Clean Streams Law, which prohibits any person from discharging "sewage" directly or indirectly into a stream, according to the group.

In letters received by the five farmers last week, Snell-Zarcone said the law defines sewage as waste products from humans or animals.

In the warning letters, each dairy farmer is accused of letting livestock onto bare ground, allowing manure and sediment to wash into nearby streams. The poultry farmer is accused of letting runoff from piles of open poultry litter run off his property.

The letters were sent to Raymond Zimmerman, 626 Nottingham Road, Fulton Township; Bill Fuller, 2272 Ashville Road, Little Britain Township; John King and his father, Emanuel King, Plain Sect farmers who live in the 1600 block of Robert Fulton Highway, East Drumore Township; and Larry Housekeeper, 1325 Lloyd Road, Little Britain Township.

Fuller, a dairy farmer with about 200 acres on several farms, was indignant about the accusations when contacted by a reporter Wednesday.

"I strip-farm. I've no-tilled for 25 years. If they want to do something, why in the devil don't they just come in and talk to me?" Fuller said.

"I think they're a bunch of shysters, if you ask me."

Fuller said he has contacted the Lancaster County Conservation District, the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau and others for advice.

Snell-Zarcone said she and other staff members drove through southern Lancaster County in the spring and witnessed runoff on the five farms.

She also said water samples were taken at the locations, but she declined to release the results.

Letters, including photographs of the farm practices, were then sent to the state Department of Environmental Protection and the Lancaster County Conservation District, requesting that the agencies inspect the farms, Snell-Zarcone said.

She said the two agencies replied they would not be doing inspections or taking water samples because of staffing and funding problems.

DEP later inspected one of the farms but did not take water samples and told the farmer to work with the local conservation district on noted problems, she said.

"They pretty much punted," Snell-Zarcone said of DEP.

DEP spokeswoman Lauri Lebo said Wednesday that because the matter involves potential litigation, the agency would have no comment.

In September, PennFuture released a study that claimed livestock operations in the Octoraro watershed of Lancaster and Chester counties was producing "staggering" amounts of manure.

The study claimed that a review of public records showed a disturbing number of large-scale farms were not complying with required nutrient-management plans.

The five farmers threatened with lawsuits are in the Octoraro watershed or on the edge in the Conowingo watershed.

"Everyone acknowledges that there are large problems in Lancaster County," Snell-Zarcone said when asked why Lancaster County farmers had been singled out for possible legal action.

"It's a logical place everyone is looking at. All these streams are very close to the Susquehanna. They all feed into the Chesapeake. It's very connected.

"Generally, the focus on the farms in southern Lancaster County is a universal problem where we're seeing livestock on bare ground."

She said small farm operations were targeted because they are more likely to have bare barnyards where manure pollution can easily get into waterways.

She said PennFuture is aware that small farmers are struggling financially, but that there are simple things farmers can do to begin to correct the barnyard runoff problem.

What would it take to head off lawsuits?

A conversation between the farmers or their consultants and local and state agencies that the problems are being addressed, the attorney said.

acrable@lnpnews.com


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 8 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
why don't they go after the millionaire corporate farmers , those whose massive operations cause far more pollution instead of picking on some plain farmers scratching out a living.
justplainjoe
QUOTE (SPAYME @ Nov 19 2009, 05:26 PM)
Bravo to this group. Waiting for the officials to do something about the pollution isn't gonig to work. Not only will the officials not do anything about it they don't even admit to it. A lawsuit is the only thing that works. Once these suits get started, its time to go after the breeders who are allowing the ground to be polluted, their runoff is much worse than that of chickens and other farm animals.

Again bravo, let the suits begin.


I 2nd that bravo . Its about time someone enforced the laws with people who have no concern for the environment; just money.

There are WATER ISSUES they need to pay concern to. In some ways no different than poisoning someone if you let waste run into waterways.
spaylady
QUOTE (spaylady @ Nov 19 2009, 08:21 PM)
I 2nd that bravo . Its about time someone enforced the laws with people who have no concern for the environment; just money.


OK, which side are you actually referring to here? Again, who's pockets would be added to if these lawsuits go through? Unless the money goes for the cause they are trying to represent, the intentions don't appear to be genuine. The article leaves that bit of information out.
terry_l
QUOTE (terry_l @ Nov 19 2009, 09:26 PM)
OK, which side are you actually referring to here? Again, who's pockets would be added to if these lawsuits go through? Unless the money goes for the cause they are trying to represent, the intentions don't appear to be genuine. The article leaves that bit of information out.

Im against farmers ignoring run off issues, polluting the environment. That costs us more in the end than any lawsuit.
spaylady
QUOTE (terry_l @ Nov 19 2009, 08:26 PM)
OK, which side are you actually referring to here? Again, who's pockets would be added to if these lawsuits go through? Unless the money goes for the cause they are trying to represent, the intentions don't appear to be genuine. The article leaves that bit of information out.


No one is getting blood from a dairy farmer now. My guess is that this is more of a threat to get things moving than anything else. There really is a problem, there just seems to be a strong difference of opinion on how we go about fixing it. What is more of a news story is what is happening to a group of farmers south of intercourse on Watson Run. EPA is about to show their hand on what used to be a local and state issue.

lanzate
Top Ads