Current Conditions
32°F - P/SUNNY
School District of Lancaster block schedule plan criticized
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era
Nov 19, 2009 08:43 EST
445 N Reservoir St Lancaster
By BRIAN WALLACE, Staff Writer

A proposal to expand block scheduling at McCaskey High School apparently caught parents, students and some teachers by surprise last week.

And on Tuesday, they let school board members know it wasn't a pleasant surprise.

Three students, four McCaskey parents and one teacher urged the board to either scrap the block idea or give it more careful consideration.

Several of them also warned that McCaskey's International Baccalaureate, honors and music programs would be weakened — if not ruined — by a switch to longer block class periods.

Superintendent Pedro Rivera assured them the proposal is only in the preliminary stages and the district would not make any changes that threaten the IB or McCaskey's small learning communities.

But the critics were unswayed.

"There are so many good things that the block scheduling is going to wipe out," said Gilberto Vega, a senior in McCaskey's Honors/IB SLC.

"I'm afraid of what this is going to do to the music program. I'm afraid of what this is going to do to IB."

A possible switch to block schedules was first discussed at last week's education committee meeting, where McCaskey principals reported on a pilot program implemented this year for 138 freshmen in the Technical/Business Careers SLC.

Those students attend four blocks of 85 to 102 minutes per day, compared with the eight 49-minute classes other students attend.

The block students overwhelmingly favor the new schedule, according to surveys, and their attendance, behavior and grades have improved, the principals said.

Teachers involved in the pilot program praised the new format, saying they can provide more academic help and develop stronger relationships with students during the longer class periods.

The principals also pointed out that fewer class changes in a block schedule reduce disruptions in hallways.

Although no implementation plan was agreed upon, the principals said McCaskey could expand the block schedule as soon as next year.

Board members asked them to return to the education committee next month with sample schedules to continue the discussion.

Parent Marylee Sauder complained Tuesday that only a few McCaskey teachers were involved in developing the block proposal.

Many teachers only learned of the potential schedule change after reading about it in the newspaper, she said.

"Bring the teachers to the table now, not when the decision is being made, but now, when they can really present the negatives and positives and you can have a really intellectual discussion across the campus," she said.

McCaskey communication arts teacher Brian McDonald agreed.

"Everybody needs to be in on that discussion," he said. "We're there (in the classrooms), we're the ones on the firing lines, we're the ones in the trenches."

Alvia Urdaneta, a McCaskey Honors/IB student, said switching to a 90-minute, four-block schedule would provide only 135 hours of instruction per course — 15 hours short of what's required for IB classes.

A block schedule also would make it difficult for students enrolled in other SLCs to fit IB and advanced-placement courses into their schedules, she said.

While the Honors/IB SLC enrolls only about 12 percent of the 2,800 pupils at McCaskey and McCaskey East high schools, students in any SLC can take IB, honors or AP courses.

Of the 51 students who took an AP Spanish test last year, Alvia said, only 10 were in the Honors/IB SLC.

A switch to block schedules would limit "amazing opportunities" for all McCaskey students, she said.

While the Honors/IB program has proven successful, Rivera said, other SLCs have been struggling, in spite of various tweaks designed to improve student achievement and behavior.

"We have a population of students who are in need. We have a group of students we have to do better by," he said.

"When we say serving all children, we mean all children — those who are succeeding and performing at the highest levels and those who are struggling."

That's why the district is considering blocks, Rivera said.

In the coming weeks, principals at McCaskey and McCaskey East will meet with teachers, parents and students to solicit more input on block scheduling before the December education committee meeting, Rivera said.

The superintendent said he has yet to be convinced that more blocks are the best option for McCaskey, but SDL needs to consider the change.

If the district decides to expand its pilot program, changes would be implemented gradually rather than campuswide in a single year, he said.

And McCaskey would not be locked into a particular block format but would likely adopt a variation of the traditional four-block schedule, he said.

Rivera could not say when he expects the school board to decide on blocks.

If the school were to switch to a full block schedule, it would become the 10th high school in Lancaster County to do so.

bwallace@lnpnews.com


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 21 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
Block scheduling should be attempted. Everything should be attempted to save the kids who need it and continue to promote the kids who need it. Eveything I see and hear about block scheduling is good.
sportsnut1662
This block scheduling issue raises a few red flags.

1. I'm not sure if the educational benefits are equally distributed across all subjects. If you think kids forget math over the summer, wait until they haven't had a math course in two years. Half the course will have to be a review. Foreign language is also a tough one.

2. Block scheduling is a time-consuming process that usually begins in January when the students select their classes for the next school year. Unfortunately, our families' experience was a nightmare in junior and senior years. It's difficult trying to earn your high school diploma and meet the entrance requirements of your dream college. You can't stop by the guidance office in August and think that you can easily switch your courses. Block scheduling can be very rigid and unaccommodating.

3. Instead of block scheduling, perhaps SDoL could look into double periods of English, Biology or even mathematics in small learning communities where transition between classes appears to be a problem. Based on the article, it appears student behavior between classes in the major thrust behind this block scheduling idea....not the educational value. To be educationally sound, block scheduling should have plenty of input from the participants: students, parents and teachers. The goal of starting up next year is unrealistic. It sounds like the SDoL admin has its mind made up already. The teachers found out about it in the newspaper.

4. I've taught block scheduling and it's a challenge. Professional development for teachers is a must. Otherwise, you will have films, independent reading and homework time. If you don't want to be in school to begin with, what makes you think a double dose of Macbeth is going to keep you focused?

5. Is there grant money involved? SDoL and other urban school districts are notorious for seeking grant-funded curriculum/programs ($$$$). A grant-funded curriculum should match the kids' needs, instead of being based on dollars, i.e., using our children as guinea pigs.

6. The McCaskey IB/honors program is what keeps families in SDoL. It's an excellent education. Start messing around with that and people will start looking for alternatives. Unfortunately education has been so focused on closing the achievement gap it has been very detrimental to the child who is on grade level or above. They are not being serviced at SDoL. The "bubble" students are – those who almost made the PSSA last year. It's a trend that is working its way into the suburbs. Our inventors, poets, visionaries, musicians, artists, accountants and tech geeks are not being served.

7. Springing the block schedule at an education committee meeting and hoping no one notices (except for a rogue board member in this case) is a typical SDoL move. SDoL tries to keep people in the dark and banks on people being apathetic.

lizard
I agree with "Lizard". Block scheduling means that you have all of 1 subject in a quarter then not again for maybe years. This is definitely not good for subjects that build on previous material (which is a significant number of subjects).
In any case, the teachers who have to implement any program need to be involved in the planning process from the beginning. That would mean NOW, not later!
TGIMom
QUOTE (TGIMom @ Nov 21 2009, 01:25 PM)
I agree with "Lizard". Block scheduling means that you have all of 1 subject in a quarter then not again for maybe years. This is definitely not good for subjects that build on previous material (which is a significant number of subjects).
In any case, the teachers who have to implement any program need to be involved in the planning process from the beginning. That would mean NOW, not later!

Not so fast. If they schedule it correctly block scheduling will be alot better. In my freshman, soph, first half of junior years i doubled up on math, science, and history. Meaning i had math all year long science all year long and history all year long. Now i did not complete 6 courses in science and history i did the min of 4. With math i took an extra "year". My 2nd half of my junior year i had almost all tech classes because i had completed requirements for high school majors early. I could have finished school after my junior but I instead took the choice to stay in school one more year and go to CTC.

I had 8 periods when i was in middle school and when we got to high school we had block. I felt as if i learned alot more during block scheduling. My after school work load was cut in half. No longer did we have to do homework for a possible of 8 classes. You also didn't have to cram for 8 classes for midterms and finals. You could spend more time getting ready for 4 subjects than 8. Teachers are able to offer better help for students overall with the added time.
natepifer18
Are the students in the IB program in classes with traditional students? Or are they in their own group of IB students? I mean, would it be possible to keep the scheduling the way it is now for the IB students and block schedule the others?
twinmom
Top Ads