Current Conditions
31°F - M/CLOUDY
Guards will fight salary freeze
County won't honor arbitration award
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era
Nov 20, 2009 08:22 EST
Lancaster
By TOM MURSE, Staff Writer

The union representing corrections officers at Lancaster County Prison said Thursday it is "prepared to fight back" against the county commissioners' decision to reject 7-percent raises awarded to the officers by an arbitration panel.

Republican commissioners Dennis Stuckey and Scott Martin, who voted against the increased pay, "chose to ignore their legally binding obligation to the AFSCME represented men and women who work in the county's most dangerous work environment: the county prison," union director Mike Fox said in a statement.

Martin, however, said the commissioners are trying to treat all county employees alike in the face of a difficult economy. The board wants to freeze the salaries of all county employees next year.

"Obviously, everyone in these difficult times has to take a hard look at how we're doing things here in the county," Martin said. "This board, in the interest of fairness across the board, at every level, is looking to treat people in the same manner."

The commissioners have already announced they are eliminating 19 government positions in late December as officials struggle to close a budget shortfall for 2010. The move, designed to improve efficiency across county departments, will save taxpayers about $900,000 next year.

The corrections officers worked without a contract from Jan. 1 through much of the spring, until a court-appointed arbitration panel awarded them a 7 percent pay hike. The decision, which was retroactive to Jan. 1, also forced the corrections officers to contribute more toward their medical benefits.

The panel also awarded the 185 county corrections officers represented by the union 7 percent pay raises for both 2010 and 2011.

The county commissioners on Wednesday rejected, by a 2-1 vote, the panel's decision. By rejecting the arbitration panel's award, the county is in effect treating it as nonbinding for the years 2010 and 2011 — a move that will likely send the matter to county court.

"It's evident through this vote that the Republican commissioners would rather waste the taxpayers' dollars on lawyers to argue legally unsupported positions, than invest those dollars on the men and women who provide vital services to the citizens of Lancaster County," Fox said.

The county had 60 days to appeal the arbitration panel's award, which was reached on April 16. It did not do so, so how the county intends to proceed is unclear. Fox said its only real option is to honor to panel's award.

"That's what they're going to end up doing after they've wasted taxpayer dollars trying to avoid it," he said.

Democratic Commissioner Craig Lehman, the lone dissenter on the board, said he voted against Wednesday's measure rejecting the raises, in part, because of the potential for legal bills in the case.

tmurse@lnpnews.com


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 21 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
The Lancaster County CO's got their retroactive raise. What was not told was that they also had to pay the higher medical benefits costs, retroactively. So, the retroactive checks received were next to nothing. Now, if the raise is taken away, the CO's will make less than they did before, because they will still need to pay the higher medical benefits fee. High attrition will continue as better jobs are found that have fewer dangerous aspects attached. Then you have the radical prison reform people who are making life worse for the CO's as they believe everything the inmates tell them.

The County Commissioners, Lawyers and Police officers of all ranks should pull regular shifts at the prison. Then they will have a better perspective of the work load of the CO's.
Wonder
QUOTE (Wonder @ Nov 20 2009, 09:19 PM)
The Lancaster County CO's got their retroactive raise. What was not told was that they also had to pay the higher medical benefits costs, retroactively. So, the retroactive checks received were next to nothing.
QUOTE
Now, if the raise is taken away, the CO's will make less than they did before
, because they will still need to pay the higher medical benefits fee. High attrition will continue as better jobs are found that have fewer dangerous aspects attached. Then you have the radical prison reform people who are making life worse for the CO's as they believe everything the inmates tell them.

The County Commissioners, Lawyers and Police officers of all ranks should pull regular shifts at the prison. Then they will have a better perspective of the work load of the CO's.


How much less is an unemployed person making now versus when they were employed - Think I'd rather have a decrease in pay than no pay at all.
grieker
QUOTE (Wonder @ Nov 20 2009, 11:19 PM)
The Lancaster County CO's got their retroactive raise. What was not told was that they also had to pay the higher medical benefits costs, retroactively. So, the retroactive checks received were next to nothing. Now, if the raise is taken away, the CO's will make less than they did before, because they will still need to pay the higher medical benefits fee. High attrition will continue as better jobs are found that have fewer dangerous aspects attached. Then you have the radical prison reform people who are making life worse for the CO's as they believe everything the inmates tell them.

The County Commissioners, Lawyers and Police officers of all ranks should pull regular shifts at the prison. Then they will have a better perspective of the work load of the CO's.


AMEN to that!
Masada
I really doubt the Gov't is going to say, "Now boys and girls, give us back the raise we gave you." They won't take away this raise if the employees are already getting it regularly in their paychecks. I have heard of freezes put on future raises of state, city,county and Federal employees. It's not new. Insurance rates go up anyway. That's to be expected in all government jobs. It's nothing new and there wouldn't be these jobs if pay for them wasn't there. So, a pay raise or two is frozen. Big deal, it happens in all states. It's not the end of the world.
Innocent
QUOTE (Wonder @ Nov 20 2009, 09:19 PM)
The County Commissioners, Lawyers and Police officers of all ranks should pull regular shifts at the prison. Then they will have a better perspective of the work load of the CO's.


I don't think anyone is questioning the workload of Corrections Officers. Commissioners, lawyers and cops are all completely different (obviously) job descriptions. Corrections Officers likely couldn't and wouldn't do their jobs either. Being a CO is a tough and mentally draining job, I can't imagine what they go through daily. I know I wouldn't want that job. Its tragic that their pay will be affected. Hopefully the economy will recover and they will get their raise, and then some, god knows they deserve it. I'm not entirely convinced that cutting their pay is the answer. The prison has enough problems getting quality officers, if they cut their pay they will probably seek employment elsewhere for higher pay. The end result would be a lower caliber of officers. If officers leave the prison will scrammble for replacement officer and hire less qualified officers for less pay. Training may also suffer. As the saying goes, "you get what you pay for." I really wish the county would reconsider cutting the pay of officers.

I can think of many other ways to cut back, our prison is not the answer.
Maffimuk
Top Ads