Current Conditions
47°F - SUNNY
Motorist held for drugs, gun
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era
Dec 02, 2009 23:28 EST
Park City Center
By RYAN ROBINSON, Staff Writer

Media Center

Related Topics

Related Stories

Bookmark and Share
Police said they seized a handgun and $100,000 worth of cocaine during a traffic stop in Manheim Township on Monday.

Aaron Bernard Johnson, 27, of Philadelphia, was charged with possession with intent to deliver cocaine in a drug-free school zone, police said.

Manheim Township police said they stopped Johnson's westbound car on Route 30 near Park City Center for an expired registration and illegal window tinting about 12:30 p.m.

A township police dog was brought in to examine the car, and the canine discovered a loaded semiautomatic handgun and about one pound of cocaine hidden inside the car, police said.

"We specifically target Route 30 and Route 222 for drug interdiction because we know that a lot of drugs comes through Manheim Township on those arteries," township police Sgt. Thomas E. Rudzinski said. "We want to stop the flow of drugs."

The cocaine has a bulk value of $15,000 to $18,000 and would sell on the street for more than $100,000, police said.

The 499 grams of cocaine is the most township police have seized in a traffic stop "in recent memory," Rudzinski said.

Township officers have received specific training that helps them to determine when illegal drugs may be in a car, Rudzinski said. How the driver is talking and his answers to certain questions are among the things that can provide clues to officers.

The Lancaster County Drug Task Force assisted in the search and seizure of the drugs and the car, police said.

Johnson was driving near a learning center at Park City Center in a drug-free school zone, Rudzinski said.

Johnson was arraigned before District Judge Jene Willwerth and sent to Lancaster County Prison in lieu of $100,000 cash bail.

rrobinson@lnpnews.com


Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 25 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
QUOTE (GoWarriors @ Dec 3 2009, 09:32 PM)
I believe that a hit from a drug dog outside the vehicle may be enough for probable cause and a search warrant, but I'm not sure why Township police decided that a warrant wasn't necessary. Pennsylvania does not have a vehicle exception to the warrant requirement and I doubt these incriminating objects were observed from a lawful vantage point if the dog was discovering them. In regard to the Article I Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution granting greater privacy rights in this Commonwealth, all these drugs may be suppressed.

Every time I see the term "drug interdiction" I'm reminded of that whole slew of cases where police searched people coming from Miami or New York on one-way tickets with no luggage thereby meeting the profile of a drug courier. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has had a tendency to suppress those drugs seized.

Perhaps Township police may want to take a ride down to the courthouse at 12:30pm in the afternoon to get a judge to sign a warrant, wouldn't take more than an hour and they wouldn't risk getting their case thrown out. I guess at least the coke is off the streets.


You might want to read up on the vehicle exceptions granted in court rulings. JPJ, I didn't know you had a pipe line into the workings of the MTPD.
groundpounder
QUOTE (GoWarriors @ Dec 3 2009, 09:32 PM)
I believe that a hit from a drug dog outside the vehicle may be enough for probable cause and a search warrant, but I'm not sure why Township police decided that a warrant wasn't necessary. Pennsylvania does not have a vehicle exception to the warrant requirement and I doubt these incriminating objects were observed from a lawful vantage point if the dog was discovering them. In regard to the Article I Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution granting greater privacy rights in this Commonwealth, all these drugs may be suppressed.

Every time I see the term "drug interdiction" I'm reminded of that whole slew of cases where police searched people coming from Miami or New York on one-way tickets with no luggage thereby meeting the profile of a drug courier. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has had a tendency to suppress those drugs seized.

Perhaps Township police may want to take a ride down to the courthouse at 12:30pm in the afternoon to get a judge to sign a warrant, wouldn't take more than an hour and they wouldn't risk getting their case thrown out. I guess at least the coke is off the streets.


are you a jailhouse lawyer and using law books from the early 90s?

JPJ - what event involving the police would you have something positive to say about their job? Honestly. Maybe the traffic stop was just a good job by the officer or if the suspect was "ratted" out, is that not too what we pay the police for. You know, to investigate and hopefully solve crimes. Instead of "good job to the proactive police officer" its "the bad guy was set up---stupid cops"

Just wondering what it would take for a "thumbs up" on your end.
oif2vet
QUOTE (oif2vet @ Dec 4 2009, 02:36 AM)
are you a jailhouse lawyer and using law books from the early 90s?

JPJ - what event involving the police would you have something positive to say about their job? Honestly. Maybe the traffic stop was just a good job by the officer or if the suspect was "ratted" out, is that not too what we pay the police for. You know, to investigate and hopefully solve crimes. Instead of "good job to the proactive police officer" its "the bad guy was set up---stupid cops"

Just wondering what it would take for a "thumbs up" on your end.

i never said the cops didn't do a good job i said the guy was ratted out and was a target. the cops didn't just happen to pull him over, asked to search his car, and like a dope he said "sure".
they were lying in wait.which is good policework.
maybe in your mind that is dissing the cops, but that is kinda strange on your part.

the guy was a smuggler. 222 is a pipeline as you may already have read. if you choose to belive it was all a coincidence then you have been watching too much adam 12 on tvland.LOL
justplainjoe
QUOTE (justplainjoe @ Dec 4 2009, 07:59 AM)
i never said the cops didn't do a good job i said the guy was ratted out and was a target. the cops didn't just happen to pull him over, asked to search his car, and like a dope he said "sure".
they were lying in wait.which is good policework.
maybe in your mind that is dissing the cops, but that is kinda strange on your part.

the guy was a smuggler. 222 is a pipeline as you may already have read. if you choose to belive it was all a coincidence then you have been watching too much adam 12 on tvland.LOL


ok maybe i just misread your post.
oif2vet
QUOTE (justplainjoe @ Dec 4 2009, 06:59 AM)
i never said the cops didn't do a good job i said the guy was ratted out and was a target. the cops didn't just happen to pull him over, asked to search his car, and like a dope he said "sure".
they were lying in wait.which is good policework.
maybe in your mind that is dissing the cops, but that is kinda strange on your part.

the guy was a smuggler. 222 is a pipeline as you may already have read. if you choose to belive it was all a coincidence then you have been watching too much adam 12 on tvland.LOL


Trust me. Aside from erratic driving, tinted windows are the number one reason to pull vehicles over for infractions when a driver has not done something wrong.

A municipal police officer in PA has the highest rate of DUI arrests based on, not erratic driving, but...window tinting.

89% of his arrests came from stops related to illegal window tinting.

It's the same thing for drug traffickers too. Window tinting. It's even mentioned in the Idiots Guide to Drug Trafficking. Oh, and loud radios.

Find and idiot with window tinting or a loud stereo, you'll have good odds on an arrest. Find them both, and throw in driving fast and slouched down with your butt on the floor and you head leaning over the passenger seat and you'll have a jackpot!
dean
Top Ads